Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $37.36B | $24.18B | $24.02B | $6.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $80.61B | $55.71B | $80.54B | $7.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $583M | $1.08B | $453M | $686M | $729M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 5.8% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 18.6x | 17.5x | 14.4x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $8.41B | $8.83B | $16.95B | $1.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $178M | $1.01B | $1.23B | $1.14B | $1.03B |
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaboard Corporation (SEB) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 317.3 | +217.3% |
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.54 vs INGR's 0.57
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.54 vs 0.57
- +80.4% vs INGR's -18.4%
ADM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
Among these 5 stocks, TSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 10.1% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
- 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%
- 9.4% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs 4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.54 vs 0.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs TSN's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TSN's 0.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.4% vs INGR's -18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs 4.1% |
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INGR leads in 2 of 6 categories
SEB leads 1 • BG leads 1 • ADM leads 0 • TSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 11.2x INGR's $7.2B. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $80.6B | $55.7B | $80.5B | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | $3.0B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $583M | $1.1B | $453M | $686M | $729M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $4.8B | $1.2B | $112M | $809M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +5.8% | +6.6% | +5.2% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +1.5% | +2.3% | +2.4% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +6.0% | +2.2% | +0.1% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +1.6% | +4.4% | +87.8% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +1.6% | +36.1% | -76.4% | +79.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SEB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.8x trailing earnings, SEB trades at a 82% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SEB offers better value at 0.54x vs INGR's 0.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $37.4B | $24.2B | $24.0B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $44.8B | $31.8B | $39.8B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.77x | 34.77x | 49.95x | 25.16x | 9.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.63x | 17.46x | 14.38x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.54x | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | 17.18x | 11.34x | 22.60x | 5.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 0.47x | 0.44x | 0.34x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.63x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 722.69x | 8.89x | 20.55x | — | 13.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. SEB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +4.7% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +2.2% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +3.3% | +4.1% | +3.3% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +4.2% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.37x | 0.48x | 0.97x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $7.4B | $7.6B | $15.8B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $178M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $8.4B | $8.8B | $17.0B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.02x | 3.03x | 2.73x | 3.10x | 27.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,840 for TSN. Over the past 12 months, SEB leads with a +80.4% total return vs INGR's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs INGR's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +32.2% | +17.9% | +34.4% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.4% | +66.2% | +26.8% | +66.8% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +10.7% | +45.6% | +46.3% | +7.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.4% | +29.2% | -1.6% | +49.4% | +28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.6% | +147.4% | +23.1% | +140.3% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +3.4% | +13.3% | +13.5% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADM and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SEB's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.12x | 0.33x | 0.25x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5989.37 | $81.75 | $69.48 | $133.93 | $141.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2437.00 | $46.81 | $50.56 | $71.60 | $100.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +94.8% | +97.8% | +92.4% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.2 | 68.4 | 64.5 | 51.8 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 3.8M | 2.7M | 1.7M | 585K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADM as "Hold", TSN as "Buy", BG as "Buy", INGR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for INGR (target: $124) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs SEB's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $60.00 | $70.25 | $133.67 | $124.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 30 | 25 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.6% | +2.9% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 31 | 13 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $9.34 | $2.04 | $2.00 | $2.76 | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +2.3% | +3.3% |
INGR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SEB vs ADM vs TSN vs BG vs INGR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Seaboard Corporation (SEB) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
On trailing P/E, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the cheapest at 8.
8x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Ingredion Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -1. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus INGR's +13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 189% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaboard Corporation grew EPS 469. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INGR leads at 14. 4% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INGR leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INGR: 15. 7% to $124. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB).
09Is SEB or ADM or TSN or BG or INGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, SEB: +55. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEB and ADM and TSN and BG and INGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEB (Industrials) and ADM (Consumer Defensive) and TSN (Consumer Defensive) and BG (Consumer Defensive) and INGR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock. ADM, TSN, BG, INGR pay a dividend while SEB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.