Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $7.23B | $24.18B | $11.41B | $37.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $18.57B | $55.71B | $12.14B | $80.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $583M | $888M | $453M | $489M | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 11.6% | 6.6% | 15.5% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 7.4% | 2.3% | 6.0% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 8.1x | 17.5x | 14.1x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $3.35B | $8.83B | $2.86B | $8.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $178M | $640M | $1.23B | $671M | $1.01B |
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaboard Corporation (SEB) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 140.8 | +40.8% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.6 | +97.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 469.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.7%
- 7.1% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- 5.9% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
- +80.4% vs PPC's -30.5%
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 27.5%
- PEG 0.13 vs SEB's 0.54
- Beta 0.02, yield 27.5%, current ratio 1.47x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.1x)
TSN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
HRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ADM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs PPC's 52.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs TSN's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs TSN's 0.33 | |
| Dividends | 27.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.4% vs PPC's -30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 20.0% vs 4.1% |
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PPC leads in 3 of 6 categories
TSN leads 1 • SEB leads 0 • HRL leads 0 • ADM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 8.2x SEB's $9.8B. SEB is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, TSN holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $18.6B | $55.7B | $12.1B | $80.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | $1.8B | $2.7B | $932M | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $583M | $888M | $453M | $489M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $773M | $1.2B | $578M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +11.6% | +6.6% | +15.5% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +7.4% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +4.8% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +4.2% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +1.6% | +4.4% | +1.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -65.3% | +36.1% | +6.5% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PPC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, PPC trades at a 87% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PPC offers better value at 0.11x vs SEB's 0.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $7.2B | $24.2B | $11.4B | $37.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $9.9B | $31.8B | $13.6B | $44.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.77x | 6.70x | 49.95x | 23.84x | 34.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.05x | 17.46x | 14.13x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.54x | 0.11x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.97x | 4.81x | 11.34x | 13.84x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 0.39x | 0.44x | 0.94x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.96x | 1.30x | 1.44x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 722.69x | 10.95x | 20.55x | 21.36x | 8.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. SEB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PPC's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEB scores 7/9 vs HRL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +24.1% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +8.7% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +20.0% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +20.8% | +4.6% | +6.0% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.91x | 0.48x | 0.36x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $2.7B | $7.6B | $2.2B | $7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $178M | $640M | $1.2B | $671M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $3.4B | $8.8B | $2.9B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.02x | 8.87x | 2.73x | 6.44x | 3.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PPC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPC five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, SEB leads with a +80.4% total return vs PPC's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPC at 19.6% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | -23.8% | +17.9% | -8.8% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.4% | -30.5% | +26.8% | -24.7% | +66.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +71.1% | +45.6% | -40.5% | +10.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.4% | +60.5% | -1.6% | -44.3% | +29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.6% | +52.1% | +23.1% | -23.9% | +147.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +19.6% | +13.3% | -15.9% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PPC and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.02x | 0.33x | 0.15x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5989.37 | $51.45 | $69.48 | $31.86 | $81.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2437.00 | $30.22 | $50.56 | $20.32 | $46.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +59.1% | +97.8% | +65.1% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.2 | 35.9 | 64.5 | 39.5 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 1.1M | 2.7M | 4.2M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PPC and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PPC as "Hold", TSN as "Buy", HRL as "Hold", ADM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for PPC (target: $46) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 27.51% vs SEB's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $70.25 | $27.25 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 30 | 29 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +27.5% | +2.9% | +5.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 13 | 34 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $9.34 | $8.36 | $2.00 | $1.15 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PPC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TSN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SEB vs PPC vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the stronger pick with 7.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
On trailing P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the cheapest at 6.
7x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
Over the past 5 years, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 1261% more volatile than PPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 91% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is pulling ahead at 7.
1% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaboard Corporation grew EPS 469. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PPC leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PPC leads at 8. 7% versus 1. 8% for ADM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRL leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8.
1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPC: 51. 3% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 27. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB).
09Is SEB or PPC or TSN or HRL or ADM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 27. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPC: +52. 1%, SEB: +55. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEB and PPC and TSN and HRL and ADM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEB (Industrials) and PPC (Consumer Defensive) and TSN (Consumer Defensive) and HRL (Consumer Defensive) and ADM (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PPC, TSN, HRL, ADM pay a dividend while SEB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.