Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEB vs WH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
SEB vs WH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $4.70B | $6.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.83B | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $583M | $193M |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $178M | $64M |
SEB vs WH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaboard Corporation (SEB) | 100 | 166.8 | +66.8% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 181.4 | +81.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEB vs WH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 469.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.7%
- 67.5% 10Y total return vs WH's 43.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 2.40x
WH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.0%
- 13.4% margin vs SEB's 5.9%
- 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SEB's 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs SEB's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs WH's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SEB's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.3% vs WH's +1.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs WH's 4.5%, ROIC 2.6% vs 9.4% |
SEB vs WH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEB vs WH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEB is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.8B annually — 6.8x WH's $1.4B. WH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEB's 5.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.8B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $583M | $193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $304M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SEB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, SEB trades at a 72% valuation discount to WH's 33.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SEB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WH's 19.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.50x | 33.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.64x | 19.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 13.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 782.81x | 19.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WH delivers a 37.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $11 for SEB. SEB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WH's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEB scores 7/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +37.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 6.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $178M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.02x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SEB and WH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEB five years ago would be worth $13,072 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,412 for WH. Over the past 12 months, SEB leads with a +94.3% total return vs WH's +1.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WH at 9.2% vs SEB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.3% | +1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +30.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.7% | +24.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.5% | +43.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEB and WH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEB is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WH's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WH currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs SEB's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5989.37 | $92.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2437.00 | $69.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 39.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, WH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.01% vs SEB's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $9.34 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +4.6% |
WH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). SEB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SEB vs WH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEB or WH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the stronger pick with 7.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Seaboard Corporation (SEB) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEB or WH?
On trailing P/E, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. at 33. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEB or WH?
Over the past 5 years, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) delivered a total return of +30.
7%, compared to +24. 1% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEB returned +67. 5% versus WH's +43. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEB or WH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning WH is approximately 153% more volatile than SEB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaboard Corporation (SEB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 7% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEB or WH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seaboard Corporation (SEB) is pulling ahead at 7.
1% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaboard Corporation grew EPS 469. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WH leads at -1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEB or WH?
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 5. 1% for Seaboard Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 2. 3% for SEB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SEB or WH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Seaboard Corporation (SEB).
08Is SEB or WH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WH: +43. 0%, SEB: +67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SEB and WH?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEB (Industrials) and WH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WH pays a dividend while SEB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.