SEG vs LIVE

For growth investors, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.

(SEG) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.

(SEG) delivered a total return of -25. 0%, compared to -67. 3% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIVE returned +30. 1% versus SEG's -25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning SEG is approximately 1% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.

(SEG) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to 45. 4% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

1% net margin versus -89. 5% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIVE leads at 3. 3% versus -55. 9% for SEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIVE leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

23)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +30. 1%, SEG: -25. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SEG (Real Estate) and LIVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SEG is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.