Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.25B
5Y Perf.+442.2%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+19.2%
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.19B
5Y Perf.-63.9%
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.+98.6%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+214.7%

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SEI logoSEI
PUMP logoPUMP
ACDC logoACDC
WTTR logoWTTR
NINE logoNINE
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesRegulated WaterOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$5.25B$1.91B$1.19B$1.89B$427M
Revenue (TTM)$622M$1.18B$1.94B$1.40B$571M
Net Income (TTM)$30M$-12M$-367M$22M$-41M
Gross Margin32.3%8.3%3.7%18.2%11.5%
Operating Margin22.0%-1.1%-8.5%2.3%2.0%
Forward P/E49.5x1993.6x41.7x
Total Debt$1.08B$249M$1.14B$374M$383M
Cash & Equiv.$353M$91M$23M$18M$18M

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SEI
PUMP
ACDC
WTTR
NINE
StockMay 22May 26Return
Solaris Energy Infr… (SEI)100542.2+442.2%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100119.2+19.2%
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10036.1-63.9%
Select Water Soluti… (WTTR)100198.6+98.6%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100314.7+214.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SEI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Select Water Solutions, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. ACDC and NINE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
The Growth Play

SEI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 98.7%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.8%
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.6%
  • 98.7% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
  • 4.8% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Defensive Choice

ACDC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.83 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: stability
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

WTTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSEI logoSEI98.7% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueWTTR logoWTTRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSEI logoSEI4.8% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyACDC logoACDCBeta 0.83 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsWTTR logoWTTR1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SEI's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SEI logoSEI1.9% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -4.6%

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SEISolaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M
WTTRSelect Water Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Water Services
71.6%$796M
Water Infrastructure
28.4%$316M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSEILAGGINGNINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 3.4x NINE's $571M. SEI is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, SEI holds the edge at +86.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$622M$1.2B$1.9B$1.4B$571M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$218M$154M$251M$217M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M-$12M-$367M$22M-$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$438M-$11M$20M-$95M-$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.3%+8.3%+3.7%+18.2%+11.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.0%-1.1%-8.5%+2.3%+2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.8%-1.1%-18.9%+1.5%-7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-70.3%-0.9%+1.0%-6.8%-1.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+86.6%-24.7%-4.0%-2.3%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-121.1%-134.2%-33.3%-4.4%-34.6%
SEI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 84.1x trailing earnings, WTTR trades at a 96% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Market CapShares × price$5.2B$1.9B$1.2B$1.9B$427M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.0B$2.1B$2.3B$2.2B$791M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS110.74x1993.59x-2.86x84.10x-7.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.49.51x41.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.59x10.67x8.19x10.70x337.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.43x1.50x0.61x1.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.38x1.98x1.20x1.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF44.88x60.74x
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SEI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEI delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEI scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.8%-1.4%-38.2%+2.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%-1.0%-13.1%+1.3%-11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.3%+1.4%-4.6%+2.3%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.9%+1.8%-6.2%+2.9%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955331
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.30x0.30x1.30x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$726M$158M$1.1B$356M$364M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$353M$91M$23M$18M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$249M$1.1B$374M$383M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.69x-0.86x-1.22x1.54x0.24x
SEI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SEI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SEI five years ago would be worth $70,032 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs ACDC's +55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEI at 113.7% vs ACDC's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+45.7%+58.4%+62.9%+52.9%+2682.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+237.5%+201.4%+55.9%+134.2%+1505.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+875.3%+132.8%-35.5%+135.9%+150.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+600.3%+41.6%-63.7%+158.4%+385.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+561.3%+7.2%-63.7%+26.6%-62.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+113.7%+32.5%-13.6%+33.1%+35.7%
SEI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ACDC and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.33x1.12x0.83x1.09x3.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$81.24$18.50$10.70$17.95$10.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.22$4.51$3.08$7.20$0.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.0%+84.1%+61.5%+93.7%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.251.955.869.482.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M3.5M1.5M1.7M125K
Evenly matched — ACDC and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SEI as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold", WTTR as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -8.8% for ACDC (target: $6). For income investors, WTTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.93% vs SEI's 0.60%.

MetricSEI logoSEISolaris Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.71$14.75$6.00$16.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts7306149
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises031
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.4%0.0%
WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SEI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSolaris Energy Infrastructu… (SEI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SEI vs PUMP vs ACDC vs WTTR vs NINE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

(SEI) is the stronger pick with 98. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the better valuation at 84. 1x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

On trailing P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the cheapest at 84. 1x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

Over the past 5 years, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

(SEI) delivered a total return of +600. 3%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEI returned +561. 3% versus ACDC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.

(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 289% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

(SEI) is pulling ahead at 98. 7% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEI leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.

(SEI) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 8% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEI leads at 21. 8% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEI leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE?

In this comparison, WTTR (1.

9% yield), SEI (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PUMP, ACDC, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SEI or PUMP or ACDC or WTTR or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SEI and PUMP and ACDC and WTTR and NINE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SEI (Energy) and PUMP (Energy) and ACDC (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and NINE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SEI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SEI, WTTR pay a dividend while PUMP, ACDC, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SEI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WTTR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SEI and PUMP and ACDC and WTTR and NINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SEI: 86.6% · PUMP: -24.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SEI: 110.7x · PUMP: 1993.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.