Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $5.56B | $82.80B | $33.74B | $66.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $622M | $35.71B | $22.17B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $3.35B | $1.54B | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 52.5x | 20.6x | 17.4x | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $12.31B | $8.13B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $353M | $3.04B | $2.21B | $3.71B |
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Energy Infr… (SEI) | 100 | 1117.6 | +1017.6% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 298.6 | +198.6% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 343.8 | +243.8% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 403.7 | +303.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 98.7%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.8%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.3%
- 98.7% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
- +250.1% vs SLB's +67.7%
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%
HAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 27.8x)
- Beta 0.57 vs SEI's 2.33, lower leverage
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 11.2% margin vs SEI's 4.8%
- 7.3% ROA vs SEI's 1.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs 8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 98.7% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 27.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs SEI's 4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SEI's 2.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +250.1% vs SLB's +67.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs SEI's 1.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs 8.3% |
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories
SEI leads 1 • SLB leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 57.4x SEI's $622M. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEI's 4.8%. On growth, SEI holds the edge at +86.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $622M | $35.7B | $22.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $7.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $3.4B | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$438M | $4.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.3% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.3% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.6% | +5.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -121.1% | -31.2% | +129.2% | +132.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 80% valuation discount to SEI's 117.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HAL's 11.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SEI's 29.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $82.8B | $33.7B | $66.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $92.1B | $39.7B | $69.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 117.35x | 23.47x | 26.93x | 25.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.46x | 20.58x | 17.39x | 27.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.04x | 12.50x | 11.68x | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.94x | 2.32x | 1.52x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 3.01x | 3.23x | 3.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.27x | 20.18x | 26.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for SEI. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $726M | $9.3B | $5.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $353M | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $12.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.69x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 9.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEI five years ago would be worth $78,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,434 for SLB. Over the past 12 months, SEI leads with a +250.1% total return vs SLB's +67.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEI at 117.7% vs SLB's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.3% | +37.9% | +37.0% | +42.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +250.1% | +67.7% | +111.3% | +86.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +932.3% | +25.4% | +41.6% | +147.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +686.1% | +94.3% | +94.8% | +207.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +599.1% | -9.2% | +17.2% | +186.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +117.7% | +7.8% | +12.3% | +35.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEI's 2.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.33x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.24 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.22 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +96.4% | +95.1% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 62.8 | 64.8 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 16.2M | 15.0M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEI as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -8.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.95% vs SEI's 0.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.71 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 66 | 64 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +3.0% | +0.6% |
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SEI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
(SEI) is the stronger pick with 98. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. at 117. 3x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
(SEI) delivered a total return of +686. 1%, compared to +94. 3% for SLB N. V. (SLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEI returned +599. 1% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. 's 2. 33β — meaning SEI is approximately 308% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 130% for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
(SEI) is pulling ahead at 98. 7% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. grew EPS 29. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEI leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 4. 8% for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEI leads at 21. 8% versus 10. 2% for HAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEI leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 17.
4x forward P/E versus 52. 5x for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. — 35. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 8. 0% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 6% for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI).
09Is SEI or SLB or HAL or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 7% yield). Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +17. 2%, SEI: +599. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEI and SLB and HAL and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SEI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.