Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEMR vs YELP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
SEMR vs YELP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.81B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $444M | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 80.5% | 90.0% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 30.4x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $264M | $216M |
SEMR vs YELP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semrush Holdings, I… (SEMR) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 63.4 | -36.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEMR vs YELP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.7%, EPS growth -335.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 17.7% revenue growth vs YELP's 3.7%
- +17.5% vs YELP's -19.9%
YELP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.82
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs SEMR's -14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.7% revenue growth vs YELP's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs SEMR's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SEMR's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.5% vs YELP's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs SEMR's -4.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs -12.7% |
SEMR vs YELP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEMR vs YELP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 3.3x SEMR's $444M. YELP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEMR's -4.3%. On growth, SEMR holds the edge at +14.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $444M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $281M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.5% | +90.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +19.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.6% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
YELP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -92.35x | 12.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.39x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.09x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.13x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.41x | 5.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SEMR. SEMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YELP's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YELP scores 6/9 vs SEMR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | +19.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.7% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$252M | -$174M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $264M | $216M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,396 for SEMR. Over the past 12 months, SEMR leads with a +17.5% total return vs YELP's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEMR at 6.9% vs YELP's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.0% | -5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | +1.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.3% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEMR and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEMR's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEMR currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs YELP's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.01 | $41.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.56 | $19.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.1 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SEMR as "Hold" and YELP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.0% upside for SEMR (target: $12) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $28.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +17.3% |
YELP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SEMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SEMR vs YELP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEMR or YELP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Semrush Holdings, Inc.
(SEMR) is the stronger pick with 17. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Yelp Inc. (YELP). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semrush Holdings, Inc. (SEMR) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEMR or YELP?
On forward P/E, Yelp Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEMR or YELP?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -36. 0% for Semrush Holdings, Inc. (SEMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YELP returned +10. 2% versus SEMR's -14. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEMR or YELP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Semrush Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning SEMR is approximately 48% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semrush Holdings, Inc. (SEMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for Yelp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEMR or YELP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Semrush Holdings, Inc.
(SEMR) is pulling ahead at 17. 7% versus 3. 7% for Yelp Inc. (YELP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yelp Inc. grew EPS 19. 1% year-over-year, compared to -335. 1% for Semrush Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEMR leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEMR or YELP?
Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -4. 3% for Semrush Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus -5. 1% for SEMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YELP leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEMR or YELP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for Semrush Holdings, Inc. — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SEMR: -0. 0% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEMR or YELP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SEMR or YELP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +10. 2%, SEMR: -14. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEMR and YELP?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEMR (Technology) and YELP (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare SEMR vs HUBS
HUBS is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SEMR.
Compare YELP vs ANGI
ANGI is one of the most direct listed alternatives to YELP.
Expand With GOOGL + META
GOOGL and META are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.