Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEV vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
SEV vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Solar |
| Market Cap | $45M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65.03B | $135M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $24.66B | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35B | $474M |
Quick Verdict: SEV vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.14
- EPS growth 273.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, current ratio 0.09x
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 17.4% 10Y total return vs SEV's -67.6%
- -18.9% vs SEV's -67.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 17.6x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs ENPH's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.9% vs SEV's -67.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs ENPH's 4.2%, ROIC -93.0% vs 6.8% |
SEV vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEV vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | — | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SEV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, SEV trades at a 98% valuation discount to ENPH's 27.5x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.4B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.69x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs SEV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -93.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23.3B | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SEV and ENPH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEV five years ago would be worth $3,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,885 for ENPH. Over the past 12 months, ENPH leads with a -18.9% total return vs SEV's -67.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEV at -31.3% vs ENPH's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.0% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.6% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.3% | -39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SEV and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEV is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENPH's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENPH currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs SEV's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.43 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.29 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.5% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 461K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% |
SEV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ENPH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SEV vs ENPH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEV or ENPH a better buy right now?
Aptera Motors Corp.
(SEV) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) a "Hold" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEV or ENPH?
On trailing P/E, Aptera Motors Corp.
(SEV) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. at 27. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEV or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Aptera Motors Corp.
(SEV) delivered a total return of -67. 6%, compared to -71. 2% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SEV's -67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEV or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aptera Motors Corp.
(SEV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning ENPH is approximately 49% more volatile than SEV relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SEV or ENPH?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aptera Motors Corp.
grew EPS 273. 7% year-over-year, compared to 72. 0% for Enphase Energy, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEV or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Aptera Motors Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus 0. 0% for SEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SEV or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SEV or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, SEV: -67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SEV and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEV (Consumer Cyclical) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEV is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare ENPH vs SEDG
SEDG is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ENPH.
Compare SEV vs RIVN
RIVN overlaps with SEV in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With SEDG + CHPT
SEDG and CHPT are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.