SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$10.29B
5Y Perf.+21.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SFD vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+32.5%
SFD vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SFD | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $10.29B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.56B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.01B | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.40B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.54B | $10.73B |
SFD vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SFD
WMT
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smithfield Foods, I… (SFD) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFD vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SFD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Walmart Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
The Growth Play
SFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 18.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 33.9%, current ratio 2.97x
- Beta 0.30, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.97x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs SFD's 34.1%
- Beta 0.12 vs SFD's 0.30
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SFD | 7.3% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% |
| Value | SFD | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 44.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | SFD | 6.5% margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.12 vs SFD's 0.30 |
| Dividends | SFD | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +33.0% vs SFD's +22.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SFD | 8.6% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 12.2% vs 14.7% |
SFD vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SFD vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSFDLAGGINGWMT
WMTWalmart Inc.
2leads
SFDSmithfield Foods, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SFD6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SFD5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WMT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFD and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 45.2x SFD's $15.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.5% (SFD) to 3.3% (WMT). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $813M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +35.1% |
Evenly matched — SFD and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, SFD trades at a 78% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SFD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.3B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.1B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.43x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.83x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.33x | 24.94x |
SFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $15 for SFD. SFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs SFD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $857M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 34.71x | 11.85x |
SFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,413 for SFD. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs SFD's +22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs SFD's 10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.6% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.3% | +37.5% |
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFD's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs SFD's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.80 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.08 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 17.2M |
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFD as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.3% upside for SFD (target: $32) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, SFD offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — SFD and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Best OverallSmithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SFD vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFD or WMT a better buy right now?
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFD or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the cheapest at 10. 4x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFD or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +34. 1% for Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus SFD's +34. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFD or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Smithfield Foods, Inc. 's 0. 30β — meaning SFD is approximately 159% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SFD or WMT?
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFD leads at 8. 3% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SFD or WMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFD: 22. 3% to $32. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SFD or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
08Is SFD or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, SFD: +34. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SFD and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SFD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SFD: 0.8% · WMT: 5.8%)Net Margin>
%
(SFD: 6.5% · WMT: 3.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SFD: 10.4x · WMT: 47.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.