SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.58B
5Y Perf.+20.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+28.0%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+367.6%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+297.6%
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SFL | NAT | TNK | INSW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $1.24B | $2.83B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $720M | $281M | $952M | $676M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $2M | $351M | $546M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 16.6% | 27.5% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 6.2% | 27.5% | 44.4% |
| Forward P/E | 351.3x | 10.4x | 6.0x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.57B | $270M | $55M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $39M | $831M | $117M |
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SFL
NAT
TNK
INSW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| Nordic American Tan… (NAT) | 100 | 128.0 | +28.0% |
| Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) | 100 | 467.6 | +367.6% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INSW leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Nordic American Tankers Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SFL and TNK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SFL
SFL Corporation Ltd.
The Income Pick
SFL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.9% yield, vs INSW's 3.2%
Best for: dividends
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
The Income Pick
NAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.1%
- Rev growth -10.7%, EPS growth -53.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.3%
- Beta 0.27, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.65x
- -10.7% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
- 80.8% margin vs SFL's -3.7%
- +160.2% vs SFL's +55.1%
- 20.1% ROA vs SFL's -0.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs 2.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NAT | -10.7% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6% |
| Value | TNK | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 80.8% margin vs SFL's -3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NAT | Beta 0.27 vs SFL's 0.67, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SFL | 7.9% yield, vs INSW's 3.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSW | +160.2% vs SFL's +55.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 20.1% ROA vs SFL's -0.7%, ROIC 9.4% vs 2.8% |
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2025
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGNAT
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories
TNK leads 1 • SFL leads 1 • NAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓NATNordic American Tanke…
0leads
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
1leads
SFLSFL Corporation Ltd.
1leads
INSWInternational Seaways…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SFLvs TNKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INSW4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TNK5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
INSW5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SFL1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 3.4x NAT's $281M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFL's -3.7%. On growth, NAT holds the edge at -8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $720M | $281M | $952M | $676M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $414M | $75M | $348M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $2M | $351M | $546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $220M | -$112M | $113M | $193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +16.6% | +27.5% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +6.2% | +27.5% | +44.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +0.7% | +36.9% | +80.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | -39.8% | +11.8% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.1% | -8.8% | -26.4% | -91.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.3% | -131.5% | +46.0% | +4.8% |
INSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 70% valuation discount to NAT's 26.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 11.0x.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $1.2B | $2.8B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -59.55x | 26.59x | 8.05x | 14.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 351.33x | 10.40x | 6.00x | 8.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.52x | 11.01x | 6.80x | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 3.54x | 2.97x | 5.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 2.41x | 1.38x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.20x | 9.87x | 25.09x | 117.08x |
Evenly matched — SFL and TNK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SFL. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFL's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs SFL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +0.4% | +17.2% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +0.2% | +15.7% | +20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +7.5% | +12.5% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +9.9% | +10.9% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 0.53x | 0.03x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $231M | -$776M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $39M | $831M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $270M | $55M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 1.06x | 109.95x | 0.90x |
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,259 for SFL. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs SFL's +55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs SFL's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.5% | +78.6% | +58.3% | +96.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.1% | +142.1% | +80.3% | +160.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +107.6% | +136.5% | +179.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.6% | +117.0% | +513.8% | +438.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.4% | -40.4% | +187.7% | +1014.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +27.6% | +33.2% | +40.9% |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFL and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NAT's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.27x | 0.35x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.96 | $6.34 | $83.54 | $91.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.73 | $2.54 | $41.05 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +92.3% | +97.3% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 52.4 | 57.9 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 5.3M | 542K | 597K |
Evenly matched — SFL and NAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SFL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFL as "Hold", NAT as "Hold", TNK as "Buy", INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for SFL (target: $15) vs -40.2% for NAT (target: $4). For income investors, SFL offers the higher dividend yield at 7.89% vs TNK's 2.44%.
| Metric | SFLSFL Corporation L… | NATNordic American T… | TNKTeekay Tankers Lt… | INSWInternational Sea… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $3.50 | $90.00 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 19 | 23 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.9% | +7.1% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $0.42 | $1.98 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SFL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SFL vs NAT vs TNK vs INSW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the stronger pick with -10.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Nordic American Tankers Limited at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +102. 6% for SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus NAT's -40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus SFL Corporation Ltd. 's 0. 67β — meaning SFL is approximately 146% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is pulling ahead at -10.
7% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -119. 8% for SFL Corporation Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAT leads at 21. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus -3. 7% for SFL Corporation Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 19. 0% for SFL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFL leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.
(TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 351. 3x for SFL Corporation Ltd. — 345. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFL: 21. 7% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) offers the highest yield at 7. 9%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).
09Is SFL or NAT or TNK or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, SFL: +56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFL and NAT and TNK and INSW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SFL (Industrials) and NAT (Industrials) and TNK (Energy) and INSW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SFL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SFL: -24.1% · NAT: -8.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.