Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Residential Construction | Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $33K | $3.35B | $8.79B | $4.05B | $5.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $4.36B | $14.82B | $2.64B | $7.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $360M | $292M | $214M | $672M |
| Gross Margin | -87.3% | 22.2% | 29.9% | 26.3% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | -375.8% | 10.4% | 4.2% | 9.8% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.9x | 14.1x | 19.4x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $1.09B | $5.65B | $131M | $2.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $376K | $689M | $182M | $610M | $851M |
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) | 100 | 424.6 | +324.6% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 501.2 | +401.2% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 376.3 | +276.3% |
| Taylor Morrison Hom… (TMHC) | 100 | 340.9 | +240.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGBX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MHO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +19.3% vs SGBX's -96.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SKY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs MHO's 6.0%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9%
- 10.1% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 16.9% vs -625.7%
TMHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 6.24x
- PEG 0.34 vs BLDR's 1.78
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 6.24x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 19.4x), PEG 0.34 vs 0.71
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 19.4x), PEG 0.34 vs 0.71 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.8% margin vs SGBX's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs BLDR's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs SGBX's -96.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 16.9% vs -625.7% |
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TMHC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SKY leads 1 • MHO leads 1 • BLDR leads 1 • SGBX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SKY and TMHC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 4381.0x SGBX's $3M. TMHC is the more profitable business, keeping 8.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGBX's -5.7%. On growth, SKY holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $4.4B | $14.8B | $2.6B | $7.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $471M | $1.2B | $306M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $360M | $292M | $214M | $672M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $199M | $862M | $260M | $710M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -87.3% | +22.2% | +29.9% | +26.3% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +10.4% | +4.2% | +9.8% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +8.2% | +2.0% | +8.1% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | +4.6% | +5.8% | +9.9% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | -5.4% | -10.1% | +1.8% | -26.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.9% | -35.9% | -151.2% | -3.0% | -51.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TMHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.7x trailing earnings, TMHC trades at a 64% valuation discount to SKY's 21.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMHC offers better value at 0.23x vs BLDR's 2.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32,963 | $3.4B | $8.8B | $4.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $3.7B | $14.3B | $3.6B | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 8.82x | 20.43x | 21.43x | 7.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.88x | 14.07x | 19.44x | 11.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.71x | 2.59x | 0.78x | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.12x | 10.35x | 12.69x | 6.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.76x | 0.58x | 1.63x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.12x | 2.04x | 2.76x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.75x | 10.30x | 21.29x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. SKY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.2% | +11.4% | +6.9% | +13.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | +7.5% | +2.6% | +10.1% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -625.7% | +11.3% | +6.4% | +16.9% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +11.4% | +8.5% | +14.8% | +13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.34x | 1.30x | 0.08x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $397M | $5.5B | -$479M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $375,873 | $689M | $182M | $610M | $851M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $1.1B | $5.6B | $131M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.81x | 6.68x | 2.19x | 51.32x | 19.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMHC five years ago would be worth $18,573 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, MHO leads with a +19.3% total return vs SGBX's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHO at 24.5% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | +1.7% | -24.0% | -13.7% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.3% | +19.3% | -25.0% | -16.3% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +93.1% | -30.1% | -2.6% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +76.7% | +51.8% | +64.0% | +85.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +599.0% | +614.8% | +714.5% | +321.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.5% | +24.5% | -11.2% | -0.9% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGBX and TMHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMHC currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.07x | 1.65x | 0.96x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.00 | $158.92 | $151.03 | $99.17 | $72.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.79 | $103.52 | $73.40 | $59.44 | $54.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.0% | +81.8% | +52.6% | +73.9% | +82.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 54.8 | 42.8 | 46.0 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 503K | 226K | 2.4M | 500K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
BLDR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MHO as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", TMHC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs 24.0% for TMHC (target: $74). SGBX is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $165.00 | $109.92 | $106.00 | $73.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 43 | 8 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $13.85 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.0% | +4.7% | +2.0% | +6.9% |
TMHC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SKY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SGBX vs MHO vs BLDR vs SKY vs TMHC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
On trailing P/E, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the cheapest at 7.
7x versus Champion Homes, Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, M/I Homes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taylor Morrison Home Corporation wins at 0. 34x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
Over the past 5 years, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) delivered a total return of +85.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +714. 5% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 271% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe & Green Holdings Corp. grew EPS 69. 1% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKY leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
6% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMHC leads at 14. 0% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLDR leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Champion Homes, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC?
In this comparison, SGBX (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. MHO, BLDR, SKY, TMHC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGBX or MHO or BLDR or SKY or TMHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 100. 0% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGBX and MHO and BLDR and SKY and TMHC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGBX (Industrials) and MHO (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials) and SKY (Consumer Cyclical) and TMHC (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MHO is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; TMHC is a small-cap deep-value stock. SGBX pays a dividend while MHO, BLDR, SKY, TMHC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.