Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SGC vs ALSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
SGC vs ALSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $188M | $10.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $570M | $3.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $543M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $1.50B |
SGC vs ALSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superior Group of C… (SGC) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 326.3 | +226.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGC vs ALSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.1%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 0.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
- 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALSN's 0.9%
ALSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.9%
- 373.8% 10Y total return vs SGC's -10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.6x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs SGC's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs SGC's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALSN's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs SGC's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs SGC's 2.1%, ROIC 22.2% vs 3.6% |
SGC vs ALSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGC vs ALSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 6.4x SGC's $570M. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGC's 1.5%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $570M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $970M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $543M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $713M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +83.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | -40.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 36% valuation discount to SGC's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SGC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALSN's 10.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $188M | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $11.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.09x | 16.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 13.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | 10.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 5.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.90x | 15.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $4 for SGC. SGC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALSN scores 6/9 vs SGC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $78M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.93x | 64.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $28,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,690 for SGC. Over the past 12 months, ALSN leads with a +27.7% total return vs SGC's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 37.9% vs SGC's 21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | +24.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.0% | +162.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +183.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +37.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ALSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGC's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.78 | $137.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $76.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SGC and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SGC as "Buy" and ALSN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 75.0% upside for SGC (target: $21) vs -5.8% for ALSN (target: $116). For income investors, SGC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.84% vs ALSN's 0.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $116.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $1.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +3.2% |
ALSN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SGC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SGC vs ALSN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGC or ALSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGC or ALSN?
On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGC or ALSN?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +183. 5%, compared to -43. 1% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +373. 8% versus SGC's -10. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGC or ALSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning SGC is approximately 4% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGC or ALSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALSN leads at 2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGC or ALSN?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 1. 2% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 2. 4% for SGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGC or ALSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) trades at 13. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGC: 75. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGC or ALSN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN).
09Is SGC or ALSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +373. 8%, SGC: -10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGC and ALSN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SGC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.