Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $188M | $349M | $790M | $2.29B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $570M | $3.09B | $1.33B | $3.44B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-266M | $35M | $330M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 26.3% | 27.2% | 42.0% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | -2.8% | 3.8% | 13.1% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 11.0x | 18.0x | 9.8x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $159M | $70M | $2.55B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $33M | $2M | $215M | $748M |
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superior Group of C… (SGC) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.1%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 0.1% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1%
- 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs PVH's -1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
HBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.
- 9.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
- +32.3% vs KELYA's -12.2%
PVH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 9.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.1% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.3% vs KELYA's -12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • SGC leads 0 • HBI leads 0 • PVH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HBI and PVH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 15.4x SGC's $570M. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, PVH holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $570M | $3.1B | $1.3B | $3.4B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | -$54M | $56M | $496M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$266M | $35M | $330M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $66M | $43M | -$8M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +26.3% | +27.2% | +42.0% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | -2.8% | +3.8% | +13.1% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -8.6% | +2.6% | +9.6% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +2.1% | +3.3% | -0.2% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -100.0% | +0.1% | -4.8% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | -2.1% | +2.2% | +8.0% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 68% valuation discount to SGC's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBI's 16.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $188M | $349M | $790M | $2.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $475M | $858M | $4.6B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.09x | -1.34x | 22.05x | -7.11x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 10.96x | 17.96x | 9.82x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | — | 15.42x | 16.64x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.08x | 0.59x | 0.65x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.35x | 6.17x | 66.99x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.90x | 3.06x | 16.88x | 10.11x | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | -24.6% | +27.2% | +73.9% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | -11.3% | +9.2% | +7.7% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -4.0% | +19.1% | +4.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | -4.3% | +20.1% | +5.4% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.16x | 0.56x | 75.02x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $78M | $126M | $68M | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $33M | $2M | $215M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $159M | $70M | $2.6B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.93x | -12.07x | — | 2.15x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,362 for HBI. Over the past 12 months, HBI leads with a +32.3% total return vs KELYA's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGC at 21.6% vs KELYA's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | +13.1% | +39.2% | — | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | -12.2% | +18.9% | +32.3% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.0% | -34.2% | -13.8% | +49.1% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -58.3% | -16.8% | -66.4% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | -33.0% | +195.5% | -62.6% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | -13.0% | -4.8% | +14.2% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KFRC and HBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBI currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.01x | 0.53x | 1.72x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.78 | $14.94 | $47.48 | $7.05 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.30 | $7.98 | $24.49 | $3.96 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +64.9% | +91.0% | +91.8% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.6 | 63.7 | 65.6 | 44.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 361K | 305K | 104.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SGC and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SGC as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", HBI as "Buy", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.0% upside for SGC (target: $21) vs 12.1% for HBI (target: $7). For income investors, SGC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.84% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $15.00 | $71.00 | $7.25 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 5 | 10 | 34 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +3.2% | +3.6% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $0.31 | $1.55 | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +3.5% | +6.4% | 0.0% | +12.9% |
KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SGC vs KELYA vs KFRC vs HBI vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -66. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 224% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PVH Corp. grew EPS -1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SGC leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp.
(PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGC: 75. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH?
In this comparison, SGC (4.
8% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGC or KELYA or KFRC or HBI or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGC and KELYA and KFRC and HBI and PVH?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGC (Consumer Cyclical) and KELYA (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and HBI (Consumer Cyclical) and PVH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. SGC, KELYA, KFRC pay a dividend while HBI, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.