Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Financial - Capital Markets
REIT - Diversified
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Financial - Capital Markets | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $155K | $123.00 | $19M | $44M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $10M | $60M | $18M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-34M | $-2M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | -2.1% | 79.7% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | -186.2% | -155.0% | -19.2% | 16.6% |
| Total Debt | $10M | $2M | $68M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $296K | $148K | $9M | $8M |
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe and Green Deve… (SGD) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| American Rebel Hold… (AREB) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| Presidio Property T… (SQFT) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AREB's -16.6%
AREB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -16.6%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
GREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -62.9% 10Y total return vs SQFT's -74.3%
- -33.2% margin vs AREB's -360.5%
- +29.0% vs AREB's -100.0%
- -3.2% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC -57.2% vs -235.6%
SQFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 6.07x
- Beta 0.87, yield 5.1%, current ratio 6.07x
- Beta 0.87 vs GREE's 3.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs AREB's -16.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -33.2% margin vs AREB's -360.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs AREB's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC -57.2% vs -235.6% |
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GREE leads in 1 of 6 categories
SQFT leads 1 • SGD leads 0 • AREB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GREE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GREE is the larger business by revenue, generating $60M annually — 12.0x SGD's $5M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.2% (GREE) to -3.6% (AREB). On growth, SGD holds the edge at +42.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $10M | $60M | $18M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$15M | $4M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$34M | -$2M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$14M | -$20M | -$67,454 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | -2.1% | +79.7% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.2% | -155.0% | -19.2% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -3.6% | -33.2% | -38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | -150.8% | -37.7% | -0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.3% | +28.5% | — | -11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +55.6% | +2.3% | -188.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AREB and SQFT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SQFT's 26.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GREE's 38.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155,445 | $123 | $19M | $44M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $2M | $79M | $138M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 0.00x | -0.65x | -1.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 38.86x | 26.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 0.00x | 0.32x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 0.00x | — | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AREB and SQFT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SQFT delivers a -23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AREB. AREB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGD's 11.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SGD scores 5/9 vs AREB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | -7.8% | — | -23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.9% | -155.5% | -3.2% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.6% | -2.4% | -57.2% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | -49.4% | -23.9% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 11.95x | 0.52x | — | 2.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $2M | $59M | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $296,202 | $147,586 | $9M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $2M | $68M | $102M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.89x | -12.58x | 0.70x | -0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SQFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SQFT five years ago would be worth $2,870 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AREB. Over the past 12 months, GREE leads with a +29.0% total return vs AREB's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQFT at -21.8% vs SGD's -89.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -100.0% | -25.6% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.4% | -100.0% | +29.0% | -40.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -100.0% | -71.0% | -52.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -100.0% | -99.2% | -71.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -100.0% | -62.9% | -74.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.1% | — | -33.8% | -21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GREE and SQFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SQFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GREE currently trades 50.4% from its 52-week high vs AREB's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.05x | 3.33x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.36 | $127200.00 | $2.42 | $23.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $0.07 | $0.87 | $2.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.9% | +0.0% | +50.4% | +15.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 15.9 | 52.9 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.9M | 138K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SQFT is the only dividend payer here at 5.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
GREE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SQFT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SGD vs AREB vs GREE vs SQFT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
(SQFT) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT?
Over the past 5 years, Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
(SQFT) delivered a total return of -71. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GREE returned -62. 9% versus AREB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
(SQFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 283% more volatile than SQFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 12% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
(SQFT) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Rebel Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Safe and Green Development Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AREB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT?
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.
(GREE) is the more profitable company, earning -33. 2% net margin versus -42. 9% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — meaning it keeps -33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQFT leads at -2. 0% versus -31. 6% for SGD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT?
In this comparison, SQFT (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SGD, AREB, GREE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SGD or AREB or GREE or SQFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Presidio Property Trust, Inc.
(SQFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 5. 1% yield). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SQFT: -74. 3%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SGD and AREB and GREE and SQFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGD (Real Estate) and AREB (Consumer Cyclical) and GREE (Financial Services) and SQFT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AREB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SQFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SQFT pays a dividend while SGD, AREB, GREE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.