Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Residential Construction
Construction
Residential Construction
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Construction | Residential Construction | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $155K | $8.79B | $5.84B | $4.12B | $42.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $14.82B | $2.95B | $1.18B | $33.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $292M | $255M | $191M | $3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 16.6% | 29.9% | 33.9% | 39.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -186.2% | 4.2% | 12.7% | 22.1% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.1x | 19.5x | 24.0x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $5.65B | $1.05B | $229M | $6.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $296K | $182M | $322M | $4M | $2.99B |
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe and Green Deve… (SGD) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 91.9 | -8.1% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 230.7 | +130.7% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 138.5 | +38.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- PEG 0.80 vs TREX's 7.16
TREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 16.3% margin vs SGD's -277.3%
- 12.3% ROA vs SGD's -35.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs -50.6%
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85 vs SGD's 1.69, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.5x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.80 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs SGD's -277.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs SGD's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs SGD's -80.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs SGD's -35.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs -50.6% |
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 1 of 6 categories
IBP leads 1 • DHI leads 1 • SGD leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 6708.9x SGD's $5M. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGD's -2.8%. On growth, SGD holds the edge at +42.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $14.8B | $2.9B | $1.2B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $1.2B | $656M | $309M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $292M | $255M | $191M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $862M | $63M | $263M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +29.9% | +33.9% | +39.2% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.2% | +4.2% | +12.7% | +22.1% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +2.0% | +8.6% | +16.3% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +5.8% | +2.1% | +22.3% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.3% | -10.1% | -3.5% | +1.0% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | -151.2% | -21.3% | +3.6% | -13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SGD and BLDR and DHI each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, DHI trades at a 43% valuation discount to IBP's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $155,445 | $8.8B | $5.8B | $4.1B | $42.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $14.3B | $6.6B | $4.3B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 20.43x | 22.33x | 22.00x | 12.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.07x | 19.50x | 23.95x | 13.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.59x | 0.92x | 6.58x | 1.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.35x | 13.41x | 13.53x | 10.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 0.58x | 1.97x | 3.51x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.18x | 2.04x | 8.26x | 4.05x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.30x | 19.41x | 30.60x | 12.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IBP and TREX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SGD. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGD's 11.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs DHI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.0% | +6.9% | +37.5% | +18.8% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.9% | +2.6% | +12.2% | +12.3% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.6% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +16.4% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +8.5% | +22.6% | +23.2% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 11.95x | 1.30x | 1.48x | 0.22x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $5.5B | $731M | $225M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $296,202 | $182M | $322M | $4M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $5.6B | $1.1B | $229M | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.89x | 2.19x | 9.47x | — | 44.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13 for SGD. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs SGD's -80.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs SGD's -89.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -24.0% | -18.1% | +9.3% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.4% | -25.0% | +34.0% | -30.8% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -30.1% | +98.3% | -30.4% | +38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +51.8% | +80.6% | -64.0% | +46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +614.8% | +650.1% | +239.9% | +424.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.1% | -11.2% | +25.6% | -11.4% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
DHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SGD's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHI currently trades 79.1% from its 52-week high vs SGD's 6.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.65x | 1.19x | 1.47x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.36 | $151.03 | $349.00 | $68.78 | $184.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $73.40 | $150.83 | $29.77 | $114.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.9% | +52.6% | +62.1% | +56.9% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 42.8 | 55.0 | 51.3 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.4M | 344K | 1.7M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBP and DHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", DHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 12.3% for DHI (target: $164). For income investors, IBP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs DHI's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.92 | $293.00 | $44.50 | $163.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 27 | 31 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.5% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.24 | — | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% | +3.0% | +1.3% | +10.1% |
TREX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SGD vs BLDR vs IBP vs TREX vs DHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the stronger pick with 2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
On trailing P/E, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, D. R. Horton, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +80. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Safe and Green Development Corporation (SGD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus SGD's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Safe and Green Development Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning SGD is approximately 100% more volatile than DHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 12% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is pulling ahead at 2. 0% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Safe and Green Development Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -42. 9% for Safe and Green Development Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus -31. 6% for SGD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
5% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SGD, BLDR, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGD or BLDR or IBP or TREX or DHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). Safe and Green Development Corporation (SGD) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, SGD: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGD and BLDR and IBP and TREX and DHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGD (Real Estate) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and TREX (Industrials) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. IBP, DHI pay a dividend while SGD, BLDR, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.