SGLY
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-97.9%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EDTK
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-75.1%
CAN
Canaan Inc.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$331M
5Y Perf.-79.4%
SOS
SOS Limited
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SGLY | EDTK | CAN | SOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Education & Training Services | Computer Hardware | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3M | $16M | $331M | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $6M | $530M | $346M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-26M | $-210M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | -42.0% | 7.8% | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | -152.8% | -323.1% | -21.0% | -9.5% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $701K | $55M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $1M | $81M | $237M |
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SGLY
EDTK
CAN
SOS
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singularity Future … (SGLY) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK) | 100 | 24.9 | -75.1% |
| Canaan Inc. (CAN) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SOS leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Singularity Future Technology Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. EDTK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SGLY
Singularity Future Technology Ltd.
The Income Pick
SGLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.40
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 14.8%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 0.40 vs CAN's 4.41
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
EDTK
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited
The Long-Run Compounder
EDTK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -78.9% 10Y total return vs CAN's -90.1%
- +18.0% vs SOS's -75.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
CAN
Canaan Inc.
The Growth Play
CAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.7%, EPS growth 51.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
Best for: growth exposure
SOS
SOS Limited
The Defensive Pick
SOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
- 150.4% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
- -7.0% margin vs SGLY's -9.9%
- -4.9% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC -9.5% vs -5.2%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOS | 150.4% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3% |
| Quality / Margins | SOS | -7.0% margin vs SGLY's -9.9% |
| Stability / Safety | SGLY | Beta 0.40 vs CAN's 4.41 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EDTK | +18.0% vs SOS's -75.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOS | -4.9% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC -9.5% vs -5.2% |
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2024
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEDTKLAGGINGCAN
Who Leads Where
EDTK leads in 2 of 6 categories
SOS leads 1 • SGLY leads 0 • CAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓CANCanaan Inc.
0leads
SGLYSingularity Future Te…
0leads
SOSSOS Limited
1leads
EDTKSkillful Craftsman Ed…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOSvs SGLYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SOS2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EDTK6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EDTK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CAN and SOS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $530M annually — 410.0x SGLY's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -7.0% (SOS) to -9.9% (SGLY). On growth, CAN holds the edge at +121.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $6M | $530M | $346M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$15M | -$66M | -$15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$26M | -$210M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$6M | $0 | -$141.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | -42.0% | +7.8% | +3.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -152.8% | -3.2% | -21.0% | -9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | -4.2% | -39.7% | -7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -104.4% | — | -407.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.9% | -92.0% | +121.1% | +48.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.2% | -7.0% | +59.4% | +33.3% |
Evenly matched — CAN and SOS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $16M | $331M | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13M | $15M | $305M | -$234M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -5.26x | -1.14x | -0.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 17.82x | 0.62x | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 1.15x | 0.55x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — EDTK and SOS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOS delivers a -5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SGLY. EDTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGLY's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAN scores 6/9 vs SOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | -133.3% | -48.1% | -5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.0% | -73.7% | -34.9% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | -24.9% | -9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.3% | -4.3% | -29.7% | -5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.05x | 0.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$517,347 | -$26M | -$237M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $1M | $81M | $237M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $700,621 | $55M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.27x | -6.78x | -104.52x | — |
Evenly matched — EDTK and SOS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EDTK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDTK five years ago would be worth $4,630 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, EDTK leads with a +18.0% total return vs SOS's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EDTK at -16.1% vs SOS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.3% | +11.1% | -33.1% | -26.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.9% | +18.0% | -14.1% | -75.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | -41.0% | -79.3% | -98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -53.7% | -92.3% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -78.9% | -90.1% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.5% | -16.1% | -40.9% | -74.5% |
EDTK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDTK is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAN's 4.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDTK currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | -0.19x | 4.41x | 2.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.47 | $1.18 | $2.22 | $9.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $0.80 | $0.39 | $0.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.3% | +84.7% | +23.2% | +11.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 50.7 | 58.4 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 234K | 3K | 9.7M | 117K |
EDTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SGLYSingularity Futur… | EDTKSkillful Craftsma… | CANCanaan Inc. | SOSSOS Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $2.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 6 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
EDTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallSkillful Craftsman Educatio… (EDTK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SGLY vs EDTK vs CAN vs SOS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SOS Limited (SOS) is the stronger pick with 150.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS?
Over the past 5 years, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) delivered a total return of -53.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDTK returned -78. 9% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
19β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately -2441% more volatile than EDTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 15% for Singularity Future Technology Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SOS Limited (SOS) is pulling ahead at 150.
4% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Canaan Inc. grew EPS 51. 1% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAN leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS?
SOS Limited (SOS) is the more profitable company, earning -5.
9% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps -5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOS leads at -9. 3% versus -149. 6% for SGLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDTK leads at 78. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SGLY or EDTK or CAN or SOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
19)). SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDTK: -78. 9%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SGLY and EDTK and CAN and SOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGLY (Industrials) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and CAN (Technology) and SOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SGLY: -68.9% · EDTK: -92.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.