Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Capital Markets
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3M | $45M | $3.10B | $3M | $580M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $44M | $1.04B | $346M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-2M | $84M | $-24M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 26.5% | 33.0% | 3.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -152.8% | 5.4% | 13.6% | -9.5% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.2x | — | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $109M | $1.07B | $0.00 | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $27M | $500M | $237M | $95M |
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singularity Future … (SGLY) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 527.1 | +427.1% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 188.5 | +88.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SGLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 14.8%, current ratio 2.49x
- Beta 0.39 vs BTBT's 3.41
GLBS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +102.8% vs SOS's -75.3%
SBLK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 1.1%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -61.0%
- Beta 0.74, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.78x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 9.0x)
Among these 5 stocks, SOS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs SGLY's -42.2%
- 17.3% margin vs SGLY's -9.9%
- 19.0% ROA vs SGLY's -59.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs SGLY's -42.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 9.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs SGLY's -9.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BTBT's 3.41 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.8% vs SOS's -75.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs SGLY's -59.0% |
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SBLK leads 1 • SGLY leads 0 • GLBS leads 0 • SOS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 806.5x SGLY's $1M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGLY's -9.9%. On growth, GLBS holds the edge at +54.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $44M | $1.0B | $346M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $16M | $311M | -$15M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$2M | $84M | -$24M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | $2M | $209M | -$141.0B | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +26.5% | +33.0% | +3.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -152.8% | +5.4% | +13.6% | -9.5% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | -4.0% | +8.1% | -7.0% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +5.2% | +20.0% | -407.3% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.9% | +54.8% | -2.7% | +48.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.2% | +141.9% | +58.3% | +33.3% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLBS and SOS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 76% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLBS's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $45M | $3.1B | $3M | $580M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$13M | $128M | $3.7B | -$234M | $498M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | -26.15x | 36.75x | -0.25x | 9.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.17x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.57x | 11.88x | — | 8.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 1.03x | 2.97x | 0.01x | 3.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 0.26x | 1.26x | 0.01x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SGLY. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBS's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBS scores 6/9 vs SOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.5% | -1.0% | +3.4% | -5.6% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.0% | -0.6% | +2.2% | -4.9% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.7% | +3.2% | -9.5% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.3% | +0.9% | +4.0% | -5.0% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.62x | 0.44x | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $83M | $572M | -$237M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $27M | $500M | $237M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $109M | $1.1B | $0 | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.27x | 0.76x | 2.08x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GLBS and SBLK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $18,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, GLBS leads with a +102.8% total return vs SOS's -75.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLBS at 31.6% vs SOS's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | +33.1% | +40.4% | -24.0% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.0% | +102.8% | +79.2% | -75.3% | -13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | +127.8% | +60.7% | -98.3% | -21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -49.9% | +82.4% | -100.0% | -82.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -99.9% | +977.9% | -100.0% | -61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.5% | +31.6% | +17.1% | -74.3% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGLY and SBLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.47x | 0.74x | 1.99x | 3.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.47 | $2.44 | $27.20 | $9.62 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $0.99 | $14.85 | $0.90 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.3% | +90.6% | +98.6% | +11.9% | +39.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 56.8 | 71.5 | 46.7 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 235K | 84K | 1.4M | 117K | 18.6M |
Analyst Outlook
SBLK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBLK as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 177.8% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 8.1% for SBLK (target: $29). For income investors, SBLK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.11% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.00 | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 24 | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.30 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBLK leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
SGLY vs GLBS vs SBLK vs SOS vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 2% for Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Singularity Future Technology Ltd.
(SGLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 776% more volatile than SGLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 62% for Globus Maritime Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -42. 2% for Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOS leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -215. 8% for Singularity Future Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -149. 6% for SGLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 177.
8% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT?
In this comparison, SBLK (1.
1% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SGLY, GLBS, SOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SGLY or GLBS or SBLK or SOS or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SGLY and GLBS and SBLK and SOS and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SGLY (Industrials) and GLBS (Industrials) and SBLK (Industrials) and SOS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SGLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. SBLK pays a dividend while SGLY, GLBS, SOS, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.