SGRP vs MMS

For growth investors, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) delivered a total return of -20. 4%, compared to -58. 9% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMS returned +39. 7% versus SGRP's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPAR Group, Inc.

(SGRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning MMS is approximately 1278% more volatile than SGRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -5. 5% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Maximus, Inc. grew EPS 10. 4% year-over-year, compared to -181. 3% for SPAR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMS leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -9. 0% for SPAR Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMS leads at 10. 6% versus -2. 2% for SGRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMS leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, MMS (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SGRP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, SPAR Group, Inc.

(SGRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGRP: -28. 9%, MMS: +39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock. MMS pays a dividend while SGRP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.