Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $4.47B | $12.24B | $9.54B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $2.68B | $8.10B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $118M | $460M | $599M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 29.1% | 26.9% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 21.0% | 12.2% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 25.2x | 10.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.27B | $250M | $3.60B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346M | $497M | $539M | $214M |
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sotera Health Compa… (SHC) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 334.0 | +234.0% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 2.46x
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 54.6%, current ratio 0.74x
- PEG 0.79 vs ICLR's 1.50
ICLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x)
CRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs ICLR's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs ICLR's -10.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -2.5%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3% |
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • SHC leads 1 • CRL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SHC and MEDP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 6.8x SHC's $1.2B. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $2.7B | $8.1B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $517M | $577M | $1.4B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $118M | $460M | $599M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | $745M | $996M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +29.1% | +26.9% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +21.0% | +12.2% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +17.2% | +7.4% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +27.8% | +12.3% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +26.5% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +16.6% | -98.7% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 77% valuation discount to SHC's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MEDP offers better value at 0.88x vs ICLR's 1.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $12.2B | $9.5B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $12.0B | $12.6B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.04x | 28.06x | 13.12x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.26x | 25.24x | 10.53x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | 1.87x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.09x | 21.31x | 7.95x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 4.84x | 1.15x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.41x | 27.57x | 1.09x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.95x | 17.96x | 8.53x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. ICLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHC's 3.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.6% | +120.9% | +6.3% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +24.8% | +3.6% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +154.9% | +6.5% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | +65.7% | +7.8% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.75x | 0.55x | 0.38x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | -$247M | $3.1B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346M | $497M | $539M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $250M | $3.6B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.38x | — | 3.96x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs ICLR's -10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs ICLR's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.4% | -24.9% | -33.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.2% | +42.9% | -10.0% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +104.6% | -34.1% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +159.4% | -45.4% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +1442.7% | +91.0% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +27.0% | -13.0% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MEDP and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 59.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.26x | 1.60x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.85 | $628.92 | $211.00 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.80 | $284.48 | $66.57 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +68.2% | +59.2% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 40.6 | 62.1 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 371K | 1.1M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
SHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHC as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", ICLR as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.4% upside for SHC (target: $22) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $498.86 | $149.63 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 19 | 30 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% | +5.2% | +4.0% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SHC vs MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sotera Health Company (SHC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Sotera Health Company at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Medpace Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus SHC's -37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 60β — meaning ICLR is approximately 28% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 4% for Sotera Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sotera Health Company grew EPS 68. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHC leads at 33. 8% versus 12. 6% for CRL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHC leads at 55. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHC: 40. 4% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SHC or MEDP or ICLR or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, ICLR: +91. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHC and MEDP and ICLR and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.