Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Regional
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1M | $4.13B | $150M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $251M | $74M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $49M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 104.7% | 85.9% | 66.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | 7.0% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $7M | $39M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $72M | $119M |
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 159.0 | +59.0% |
| BankFinancial Corpo… (BFIN) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 46.1% vs BFIN's 3.4%
LGND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 27.3%, EPS growth -107.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.6%
- 73.0% 10Y total return vs BFIN's 24.6%
BFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and stability.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 23.6x)
- Beta 0.60 vs SHFS's 1.87
- 3.3% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.3% revenue growth vs SHFS's -9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs SHFS's -262.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs SHFS's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.1% vs SHFS's -81.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs SHFS's -389.6%, ROIC -2.3% vs -13.7% |
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGND leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGND is the larger business by revenue, generating $251M annually — 13.6x SHFS's $18M. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHFS's -2.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $251M | $74M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $52M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $49M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $31M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +85.9% | +66.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.2% | +7.0% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +19.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +12.2% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +122.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.8% | +15.6% | +18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BFIN's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $4.1B | $150M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $4.1B | $69M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -956.05x | 36.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.65x | 15.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 322.10x | 13.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 24.74x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.63x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.15x | 53.41x | 27.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SHFS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BFIN's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFIN scores 7/9 vs SHFS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +5.1% | +1.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +3.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.7% | -2.3% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.1% | -2.7% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$65M | -$80M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $72M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $7M | $39M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.46x | 22.69x | 0.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGND leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24 for SHFS. Over the past 12 months, LGND leads with a +99.1% total return vs SHFS's -81.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 39.5% vs SHFS's -64.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.3% | +10.6% | 0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.8% | +99.1% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +171.6% | +75.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +61.0% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +73.0% | +24.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.1% | +39.5% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHFS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFIN currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs SHFS's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 0.99x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.19 | $247.38 | $12.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $98.89 | $10.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.1% | +85.0% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 59.3 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 270K | 226K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
LGND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGND as "Buy", BFIN as "Hold". BFIN is the only dividend payer here at 3.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $267.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LGND leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger pick with 27.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 2% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) offers the better valuation at 36. 4x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
On forward P/E, BankFinancial Corporation is actually cheaper at 15.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.
0%, compared to -99. 8% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGND returned +73. 0% versus SHFS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus SHF Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning SHFS is approximately 210% more volatile than BFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 25% for BankFinancial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is pulling ahead at 27.
3% versus -9. 2% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BankFinancial Corporation grew EPS -55. 4% year-over-year, compared to -114. 7% for SHF Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
5% net margin versus -262. 5% for SHF Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BFIN leads at 6. 8% versus -24. 2% for SHFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHFS leads at 104. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) trades at 15.
2x forward P/E versus 23. 6x for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHFS or LGND or BFIN?
In this comparison, BFIN (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SHFS, LGND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 3. 3% yield). SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFIN: +24. 6%, SHFS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHFS and LGND and BFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SHFS (Financial Services) and LGND (Healthcare) and BFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SHFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BFIN pays a dividend while SHFS, LGND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.