Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Regional
Financial - Credit Services
REIT - Diversified
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Biotechnology | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1M | $4.35B | $150M | $227M | $1.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $251M | $74M | $353M | $386M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $49M | $2M | $47M | $114M |
| Gross Margin | 104.7% | 85.9% | 66.2% | 96.7% | 97.7% |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | 7.0% | 6.8% | 50.5% | 39.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.6x | 15.2x | 8.7x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $7M | $39M | $316M | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $72M | $119M | $202M | $22M |
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 167.4 | +67.4% |
| BankFinancial Corpo… (BFIN) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| Safehold Inc. (SAFE) | 100 | 16.9 | -83.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 46.1% vs BFIN's 3.4%
LGND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 82.2% 10Y total return vs MFIN's 61.7%
- 27.3% revenue growth vs SHFS's -9.2%
- +116.0% vs SHFS's -80.2%
- 3.3% ROA vs SHFS's -389.6%, ROIC -2.3% vs -13.7%
BFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 24.8%, current ratio 0.35x
- Beta 0.56 vs SHFS's 1.83
MFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.0x)
SAFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 4.7%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Beta 0.95, yield 4.7%, current ratio 17.86x
- 29.7% margin vs SHFS's -262.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.3% revenue growth vs SHFS's -9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.7% margin vs SHFS's -262.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SHFS's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MFIN's 4.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.0% vs SHFS's -80.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs SHFS's -389.6%, ROIC -2.3% vs -13.7% |
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
LGND leads 1 • BFIN leads 1 • SAFE leads 1 • SHFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LGND and MFIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $386M annually — 20.9x SHFS's $18M. SAFE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHFS's -2.6%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $251M | $74M | $353M | $386M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $52M | -$8M | $111M | $163M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | $49M | $2M | $47M | $114M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $31M | $3M | $126M | $48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +85.9% | +66.2% | +96.7% | +97.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.2% | +7.0% | +6.8% | +50.5% | +39.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +19.3% | +5.5% | +12.2% | +29.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +12.2% | +7.4% | +35.7% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +122.8% | — | — | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.8% | +15.6% | +18.8% | +16.3% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 85% valuation discount to BFIN's 36.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 339.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $4.4B | $150M | $227M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $4.3B | $69M | $342M | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -1006.41x | 36.36x | 5.43x | 9.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.64x | 15.19x | 8.66x | 8.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 339.34x | 13.36x | 1.92x | 17.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 26.04x | 2.01x | 0.64x | 2.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.88x | 0.96x | 0.46x | 0.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.11x | 56.22x | 27.34x | 1.80x | 22.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LGND and MFIN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SHFS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAFE's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFIN scores 7/9 vs SAFE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +5.1% | +1.5% | +9.4% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +3.3% | +0.2% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.7% | -2.3% | +1.9% | +17.2% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.1% | -2.7% | +2.3% | +10.0% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.25x | 0.62x | 1.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$65M | -$80M | $115M | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $72M | $119M | $202M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $7M | $39M | $316M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.46x | 22.69x | 0.09x | 1.07x | 1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGND leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $17,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23 for SHFS. Over the past 12 months, LGND leads with a +116.0% total return vs SHFS's -80.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 41.9% vs SHFS's -64.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.8% | +16.5% | 0.0% | -3.9% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.2% | +116.0% | +0.2% | +10.2% | +3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +185.9% | +75.6% | +60.4% | -38.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +74.8% | +31.6% | +24.8% | -70.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +82.2% | +24.6% | +61.7% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.3% | +41.9% | +20.6% | +17.1% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHFS's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFIN currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs SHFS's 5.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.03x | 0.56x | 1.14x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.19 | $247.38 | $12.96 | $11.00 | $17.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $98.89 | $10.69 | $7.88 | $12.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.0% | +89.5% | +92.6% | +87.8% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.9 | 42.0 | 42.3 | 58.2 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 275K | 226K | 0 | 59K | 336K |
Analyst Outlook
SAFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGND as "Buy", BFIN as "Hold", MFIN as "Hold", SAFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.9% upside for LGND (target: $268) vs -0.9% for SAFE (target: $15). For income investors, SAFE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.69% vs BFIN's 3.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $267.75 | — | — | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 2 | 9 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.3% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.40 | $0.45 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LGND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SHFS vs LGND vs BFIN vs MFIN vs SAFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger pick with 27.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 2% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus BankFinancial Corporation at 36. 4x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +74.
8%, compared to -99. 8% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LGND returned +82. 2% versus SHFS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus SHF Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SHFS is approximately 229% more volatile than BFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 184% for Safehold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is pulling ahead at 27.
3% versus -9. 2% for SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medallion Financial Corp. grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -114. 7% for SHF Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAFE leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
Safehold Inc.
(SAFE) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 7% net margin versus -262. 5% for SHF Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAFE leads at 79. 8% versus -24. 2% for SHFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHFS leads at 104. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGND: 20. 9% to $267. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE?
In this comparison, SAFE (4.
7% yield), MFIN (4. 7% yield), BFIN (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SHFS, LGND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHFS or LGND or BFIN or MFIN or SAFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 3. 3% yield). SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFIN: +24. 6%, SHFS: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHFS and LGND and BFIN and MFIN and SAFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SHFS (Financial Services) and LGND (Healthcare) and BFIN (Financial Services) and MFIN (Financial Services) and SAFE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SHFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAFE is a small-cap deep-value stock. BFIN, MFIN, SAFE pay a dividend while SHFS, LGND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.