Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SHG vs IBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SHG vs IBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $33.76B | $95.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.77T | $2.95T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.00T | $528.91B |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 68.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $154.21T | $2.04T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21.14T | $2.38T |
SHG vs IBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shinhan Financial G… (SHG) | 100 | 276.5 | +176.5% |
| ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) | 100 | 307.4 | +207.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHG vs IBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.00 vs IBN's 0.01
- Beta 0.89, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.36x
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.2x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.01
IBN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 25.2%, EPS growth 14.6%
- 355.6% 10Y total return vs SHG's 148.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.2% NII/revenue growth vs SHG's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.2x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs SHG's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBN's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.9% vs IBN's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBN's 0.4% |
SHG vs IBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.77T annually — 13.5x IBN's $2.95T. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.3% (IBN) to 12.7% (SHG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.77T | $2.95T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.41T | $782.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.00T | $528.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10.55T | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +68.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +26.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.3% | +14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SHG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, SHG trades at a 47% valuation discount to IBN's 17.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBN offers better value at 0.48x vs SHG's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.8B | $95.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $125.5B | $92.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.47x | 17.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | 0.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.42x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.23x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.91x | 11.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBN delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHG. IBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHG's 2.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHG scores 9/9 vs IBN's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.77x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $133.07T | -$346.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21.14T | $2.38T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154.21T | $2.04T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 1.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHG five years ago would be worth $20,350 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,548 for IBN. Over the past 12 months, SHG leads with a +89.9% total return vs IBN's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHG at 39.0% vs IBN's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.9% | -20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.8% | +18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | +65.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.9% | +355.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHG and IBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBN is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHG's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHG currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs IBN's 77.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.40 | $34.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.96 | $25.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +77.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 304K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHG and IBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHG as "Buy" and IBN as "Buy". For income investors, SHG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.69% vs IBN's 0.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2641.09 | $19.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% |
IBN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SHG vs IBN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHG or IBN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the stronger pick with 25.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG). Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHG or IBN?
On trailing P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus ICICI Bank Limited at 17. 8x. On forward P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 00x versus ICICI Bank Limited's 0. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHG or IBN?
Over the past 5 years, Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) delivered a total return of +103. 5%, compared to +65. 5% for ICICI Bank Limited (IBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBN returned +355. 6% versus SHG's +148. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHG or IBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 89β — meaning SHG is approximately 52% more volatile than IBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 3% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHG or IBN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is pulling ahead at 25.
2% versus 12. 4% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to 14. 6% for ICICI Bank Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHG or IBN?
ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
3% net margin versus 12. 7% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBN leads at 24. 8% versus 17. 9% for SHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBN leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHG or IBN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus ICICI Bank Limited's 0. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 2x for ICICI Bank Limited — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHG or IBN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 8% for ICICI Bank Limited (IBN).
09Is SHG or IBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
59), 0. 8% yield, +355. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBN: +355. 6%, SHG: +148. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHG and IBN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IBN is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.