Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$351M
5Y Perf.-15.3%
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CY
Market Cap$78M
5Y Perf.-92.3%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.10B
5Y Perf.+427.1%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$740M
5Y Perf.+589.2%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.+1020.6%

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SHIP logoSHIP
CTRM logoCTRM
SBLK logoSBLK
SB logoSB
NMM logoNMM
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$351M$78M$3.10B$740M$2.16B
Revenue (TTM)$153M$68M$1.04B$275M$1.31B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$-44M$84M$46M$262M
Gross Margin45.4%23.8%33.0%36.9%56.7%
Operating Margin23.4%-62.2%13.6%26.0%28.2%
Forward P/E6.0x2.3x7.2x12.8x4.9x
Total Debt$290M$111M$1.07B$537M$1.42B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$88M$500M$84M$270M

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SHIP
CTRM
SBLK
SB
NMM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10084.7-15.3%
Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM)1007.7-92.3%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100527.1+427.1%
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100689.2+589.2%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)1001120.6+1020.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Safe Bulkers, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SHIP and CTRM also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick

SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +207.6% vs CTRM's -7.4%
Best for: momentum
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.
The Value Play

CTRM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (2.3x vs 4.9x)
Best for: value
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs NMM's 283.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • Beta 0.96, yield 3.9%, current ratio 1.91x
  • 8.2% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Quality Compounder

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • 19.9% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
  • Beta 0.71 vs CTRM's 1.17
  • 4.4% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 8.3% vs 0.2%
Best for: quality and stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSB logoSB8.2% revenue growth vs CTRM's -32.1%
ValueCTRM logoCTRMLower P/E (2.3x vs 4.9x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
Stability / SafetyNMM logoNMMBeta 0.71 vs CTRM's 1.17
DividendsSB logoSB3.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.6% vs CTRM's -7.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs CTRM's -6.3%, ROIC 8.3% vs 0.2%

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
CTRMCastor Maritime Inc.
FY 2024
Asset Management Segment
100.0%$1M
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 19.3x CTRM's $68M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRM's -65.4%. On growth, SHIP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$153M$68M$1.0B$275M$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$68M-$27M$311M$131M$693M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M-$44M$84M$46M$262M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M-$58M$209M$55M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.4%+23.8%+33.0%+36.9%+56.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.4%-62.2%+13.6%+26.0%+28.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.7%-65.4%+8.1%+16.8%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%-86.1%+20.0%+19.9%+2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%+10.2%-2.7%-3.7%+1.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.4%-94.1%+58.3%-31.8%-40.6%
NMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CTRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.3x trailing earnings, CTRM trades at a 94% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Market CapShares × price$351M$78M$3.1B$740M$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$578M$101M$3.7B$1.2B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.45x2.31x36.75x8.47x6.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.01x7.17x12.78x4.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.48x5.84x11.88x7.02x5.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.22x1.18x2.97x2.41x1.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.12x1.26x0.91x0.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.61x14.74x
CTRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CTRM. CTRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%-8.0%+3.4%+5.6%+8.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%-6.3%+2.2%+3.4%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+0.2%+3.2%+6.6%+8.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.1%+0.2%+4.0%+8.6%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x0.18x0.44x0.65x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$228M$23M$572M$453M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$88M$500M$84M$270M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$290M$111M$1.1B$537M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.68x-4.80x2.08x2.34x2.78x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $23,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,220 for CTRM. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.6% total return vs CTRM's -7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 57.5% vs CTRM's -32.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+84.3%-5.2%+40.4%+46.6%+46.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+207.6%-7.4%+79.2%+111.4%+103.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+290.8%-69.6%+60.7%+108.5%+231.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.5%-87.8%+82.4%+78.3%+137.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-99.0%+977.9%+775.6%+283.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+57.5%-32.8%+17.1%+27.7%+49.1%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SHIP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTRM's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs CTRM's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.17x1.17x0.74x0.96x0.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.80$2.65$27.20$7.20$77.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.41$1.66$14.85$3.33$35.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+75.7%+98.6%+97.6%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.654.671.561.452.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded255K52K1.4M562K166K
Evenly matched — SHIP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SHIP as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", SB as "Buy", NMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -40.3% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs NMM's 0.27%.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$29.00$4.20$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3242214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+3.2%+1.1%+3.9%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01033
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46$0.06$0.30$0.27$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.2%+3.9%+1.2%
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTRM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SHIP vs CTRM vs SBLK vs SB vs NMM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) offers the better valuation at 2. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

On trailing P/E, Castor Maritime Inc.

(CTRM) is the cheapest at 2. 3x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -87. 8% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 9% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Castor Maritime Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning CTRM is approximately 64% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -32. 1% for Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 3% for CTRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Safe Bulkers, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 13. 4% to $85. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

09

Is SHIP or CTRM or SBLK or SB or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +977. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 9%, CTRM: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SHIP and CTRM and SBLK and SB and NMM?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTRM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SHIP, CTRM, SBLK, SB pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTRM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SHIP and CTRM and SBLK and SB and NMM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SHIP: 18.6% · CTRM: 10.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SHIP: 16.4x · CTRM: 2.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.