SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$334M
5Y Perf.-19.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SHIP vs SBLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.10B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
SHIP vs SBLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SHIP | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $334M | $3.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $290M | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $500M |
SHIP vs SBLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SHIP
SBLK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHIP vs SBLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SHIP leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Income Pick
SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth -5.6%, EPS growth -52.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.1%
- -5.6% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs SHIP's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHIP | -5.6% revenue growth vs SBLK's -17.6% |
| Value | SHIP | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 8.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SHIP | 9.7% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | SBLK | Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SHIP | 2.9% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHIP | +194.7% vs SBLK's +83.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SHIP | 2.5% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 6.1% vs 3.2% |
SHIP vs SBLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
Segment breakdown not available.
SHIP vs SBLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSHIPLAGGINGSBLK
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Co…
1leads
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Hol…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SHIP5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SHIP5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SHIP6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHIP4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SBLK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SHIP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 6.8x SHIP's $153M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.7% (SHIP) to 8.1% (SBLK). On growth, SHIP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $68M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.6% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.4% | +58.3% |
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, SHIP trades at a 58% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBLK's 11.9x.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $561M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.65x | 36.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.76x | 8.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.27x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.11x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.61x | 14.78x |
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. SBLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.03x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $228M | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $500M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $290M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.68x | 2.08x |
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBLK five years ago would be worth $19,702 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,757 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +194.7% total return vs SBLK's +83.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 55.1% vs SBLK's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.5% | +40.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +194.7% | +83.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +273.4% | +61.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | +97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +875.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.1% | +17.2% |
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs SHIP's 94.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.77 | $27.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.37 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 1.5M |
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SHIP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHIP as "Buy" and SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs 7.5% for SHIP (target: $17). For income investors, SHIP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | SHIPSeanergy Maritime… | SBLKStar Bulk Carrier… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.46 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
SHIP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SHIP leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SBLK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallSeanergy Maritime Holdings … (SHIP)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SHIP vs SBLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHIP or SBLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the stronger pick with -5. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHIP or SBLK?
On trailing P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHIP or SBLK?
Over the past 5 years, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) delivered a total return of +97. 0%, compared to +77. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +875. 7% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHIP or SBLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 66% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHIP or SBLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is pulling ahead at -5. 6% versus -17. 6% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. grew EPS -52. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 9% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHIP leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHIP or SBLK?
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus 8. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus 13. 5% for SBLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHIP leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHIP or SBLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 7. 8% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHIP or SBLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is SHIP or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +875. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +875. 7%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHIP and SBLK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SHIP: 18.6% · SBLK: -2.7%)Net Margin>
%
(SHIP: 9.7% · SBLK: 8.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SHIP: 15.7x · SBLK: 36.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.