SHLS vs GNRC vs REZI vs ARRY vs FTCI

For growth investors, FTC Solar, Inc.

(FTCI) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is the cheapest at 39. 2x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) delivered a total return of +33. 0%, compared to -96. 6% for FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus FTCI's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus FTC Solar, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning FTCI is approximately 62% more volatile than GNRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTC Solar, Inc.

(FTCI) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHLS leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -77. 2% for FTC Solar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -33. 5% for FTCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 19. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FTCI: 251. 3% to $15. 00.

In this comparison, REZI (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. SHLS, GNRC, ARRY, FTCI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+666. 1% 10Y return). FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNRC: +666. 1%, FTCI: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SHLS (Energy) and GNRC (Industrials) and REZI (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy) and FTCI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REZI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTCI is a small-cap high-growth stock. REZI pays a dividend while SHLS, GNRC, ARRY, FTCI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.