SID
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
Steel
Market Cap$1.86B
5Y Perf.-25.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SID vs MT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MT
ArcelorMittal S.A.
Steel
Market Cap$48.02B
5Y Perf.+555.8%
SID vs MT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SID | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $1.86B | $48.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.42B | $61.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.56B | $3.15B |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 54.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $57.10B | $13.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.31B | $5.48B |
SID vs MT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SID
MT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Siderúrgi… (SID) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) | 100 | 655.8 | +555.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SID vs MT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SID
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
The Defensive Pick
SID is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.07, yield 27.7%, current ratio 1.58x
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 13.7x)
- 27.7% yield, vs MT's 0.9%
Best for: defensive
MT
ArcelorMittal S.A.
The Income Pick
MT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth -1.7%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.4%
- 315.6% 10Y total return vs SID's 4.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MT | -1.7% revenue growth vs SID's -3.9% |
| Value | SID | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 13.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MT | 5.1% margin vs SID's -3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | MT | Beta 1.70 vs SID's 2.07, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SID | 27.7% yield, vs MT's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MT | +112.1% vs SID's -16.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MT | 3.3% ROA vs SID's -1.9%, ROIC 4.5% vs 6.1% |
SID vs MT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
SID vs MT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMTLAGGINGSID
SIDCompanhia Siderúrgica…
1leads
MTArcelorMittal S.A.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SIDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SID6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MT and SID operate at a comparable scale, with $61.4B and $45.4B in trailing revenue. MT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SID's -3.4%. On growth, SID holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.4B | $61.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.7B | $6.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.4B | $471M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +54.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | +145.1% |
MT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SID leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SID's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MT's 8.5x.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $48.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $56.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.96x | 15.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.52x | 13.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.52x | 8.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 0.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.90x | 101.95x |
SID leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MT delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SID. MT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SID's 3.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MT scores 7/9 vs SID's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.8% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.69x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.8B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.3B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57.1B | $13.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 13.28x |
MT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MT five years ago would be worth $20,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,004 for SID. Over the past 12 months, MT leads with a +112.1% total return vs SID's -16.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MT at 33.0% vs SID's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.0% | +34.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.2% | +112.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.9% | +135.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | +101.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.4% | +315.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | +33.0% |
MT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MT is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SID's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs SID's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $67.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $29.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 1.8M |
MT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SID and MT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SID as "Sell" and MT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.0% upside for SID (target: $1) vs -13.6% for MT (target: $55). For income investors, SID offers the higher dividend yield at 27.65% vs MT's 0.87%.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | MTArcelorMittal S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.40 | $54.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +27.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.91 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +0.5% |
Evenly matched — SID and MT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SID leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallArcelorMittal S.A. (MT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SID vs MT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SID or MT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) is the stronger pick with -1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SID or MT?
On forward P/E, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is actually cheaper at 12.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SID or MT?
Over the past 5 years, ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) delivered a total return of +101. 9%, compared to -70. 0% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MT returned +315. 6% versus SID's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SID or MT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional's 2. 07β — meaning SID is approximately 22% more volatile than MT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 4% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SID or MT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) is pulling ahead at -1. 7% versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ArcelorMittal S. A. grew EPS 143. 2% year-over-year, compared to -383. 3% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional. Over a 3-year CAGR, SID leads at -3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SID or MT?
ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus -5. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SID leads at 9. 1% versus 5. 9% for MT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SID leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SID or MT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) trades at 12.
5x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for ArcelorMittal S. A. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SID: 0. 0% to $1. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SID or MT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) offers the highest yield at 27. 7%, versus 0. 9% for ArcelorMittal S. A. (MT).
09Is SID or MT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ArcelorMittal S.
A. (MT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 9% yield, +315. 6% 10Y return). Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MT: +315. 6%, SID: +4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SID and MT?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SID is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SID: 6.6% · MT: 1.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.