SID
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
Steel
Market Cap$1.72B
5Y Perf.-31.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SID vs GGB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
Steel
Market Cap$9.62B
5Y Perf.+142.4%
SID vs GGB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SID | GGB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $1.72B | $9.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.42B | $69.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.56B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 11.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $57.10B | $15.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.31B | $5.93B |
SID vs GGB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SID
GGB
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Siderúrgi… (SID) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Gerdau S.A. (GGB) | 100 | 242.4 | +142.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SID vs GGB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GGB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SID
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
The Income Pick
SID is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.07, yield 29.4%
- 29.4% yield, vs GGB's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
The Growth Play
GGB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.2%, EPS growth -68.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
- 329.2% 10Y total return vs SID's 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 2.89x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GGB | 4.2% revenue growth vs SID's -3.9% |
| Value | GGB | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 11.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | GGB | 2.0% margin vs SID's -3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | GGB | Beta 1.31 vs SID's 2.07, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SID | 29.4% yield, vs GGB's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GGB | +92.7% vs SID's -21.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GGB | 1.6% ROA vs SID's -1.9%, ROIC 6.8% vs 6.1% |
SID vs GGB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSIDLAGGINGGGB
GGBGerdau S.A.
3leads
SIDCompanhia Siderúrgica…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GGBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SID4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SID5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GGB9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GGB6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GGB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SID1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SID leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GGB is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.9B annually — 1.5x SID's $45.4B. GGB is the more profitable business, keeping 2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SID's -3.4%. On growth, SID holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.4B | $69.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.7B | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.4B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +11.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | -144.6% |
SID leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SID leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SID's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GGB's 6.1x.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.5B | $11.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.60x | 34.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.63x | 1.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.45x | 6.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.73x | 36.80x |
SID leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GGB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GGB delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SID. GGB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SID's 3.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GGB scores 5/9 vs SID's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.8% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.69x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.8B | $9.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.3B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57.1B | $15.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 3.47x |
GGB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GGB five years ago would be worth $12,347 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,994 for SID. Over the past 12 months, GGB leads with a +92.7% total return vs SID's -21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GGB at 8.7% vs SID's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.3% | +27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.7% | +92.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +28.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | +23.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | +329.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.6% | +8.7% |
GGB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SID's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GGB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SID's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $4.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $2.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 18.2M |
GGB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SID leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SID as "Sell" and GGB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for GGB (target: $5) vs 7.7% for SID (target: $1). For income investors, SID offers the higher dividend yield at 29.44% vs GGB's 2.67%.
| Metric | SIDCompanhia Siderúr… | GGBGerdau S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.40 | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +29.4% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.91 | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +2.4% |
SID leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
SID leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GGB leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallCompanhia Siderúrgica Nacio… (SID)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SID vs GGB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SID or GGB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) is the stronger pick with 4. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Gerdau S. A. (GGB) offers the better valuation at 34. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gerdau S. A. (GGB) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SID or GGB?
On forward P/E, Gerdau S.
A. is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SID or GGB?
Over the past 5 years, Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) delivered a total return of +23. 5%, compared to -70. 1% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GGB returned +329. 2% versus SID's +3. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SID or GGB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional's 2. 07β — meaning SID is approximately 58% more volatile than GGB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gerdau S. A. (GGB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SID or GGB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) is pulling ahead at 4. 2% versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gerdau S. A. grew EPS -68. 3% year-over-year, compared to -383. 3% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional. Over a 3-year CAGR, SID leads at -3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SID or GGB?
Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus -5. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SID leads at 9. 1% versus 8. 4% for GGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SID leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SID or GGB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GGB: 9. 4% to $5. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SID or GGB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) offers the highest yield at 29. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Gerdau S. A. (GGB).
09Is SID or GGB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gerdau S.
A. (GGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 7% yield, +329. 2% 10Y return). Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GGB: +329. 2%, SID: +3. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SID and GGB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SID is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SID: 6.6% · GGB: 0.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.