Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SID vs NUE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
SID vs NUE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $1.86B | $53.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.42B | $34.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.56B | $2.33B |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $57.10B | $7.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.31B | $2.26B |
SID vs NUE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Siderúrgi… (SID) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 554.2 | +454.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SID vs NUE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SID is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 16.7x)
- 27.7% yield, vs NUE's 0.9%
NUE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 416.6% 10Y total return vs SID's 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs SID's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs SID's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs SID's 2.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.7% yield, vs NUE's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.3% vs SID's -16.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs SID's -1.9%, ROIC 7.7% vs 6.1% |
SID vs NUE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SID vs NUE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SID and NUE operate at a comparable scale, with $45.4B and $34.2B in trailing revenue. NUE is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SID's -3.4%. On growth, NUE holds the edge at +21.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.4B | $34.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.7B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.4B | $532M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +21.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SID leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SID's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NUE's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $53.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $58.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.96x | 31.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.52x | 16.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.52x | 14.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 2.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.90x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NUE leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NUE delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SID. NUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SID's 3.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs SID's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.8% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.69x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.8B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.3B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 29.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUE five years ago would be worth $25,556 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,004 for SID. Over the past 12 months, NUE leads with a +102.3% total return vs SID's -16.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUE at 19.3% vs SID's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.0% | +38.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.2% | +102.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.9% | +70.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | +155.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.4% | +416.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | +19.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NUE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUE is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SID's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SID's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $235.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $106.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 85.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SID and NUE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SID as "Sell" and NUE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.0% upside for SID (target: $1) vs -4.9% for NUE (target: $223). For income investors, SID offers the higher dividend yield at 27.65% vs NUE's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.40 | $222.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +27.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.91 | $2.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +1.3% |
NUE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SID leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SID vs NUE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SID or NUE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Nucor Corporation (NUE) offers the better valuation at 31. 1x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nucor Corporation (NUE) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SID or NUE?
On forward P/E, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is actually cheaper at 12.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SID or NUE?
Over the past 5 years, Nucor Corporation (NUE) delivered a total return of +155.
6%, compared to -70. 0% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUE returned +416. 6% versus SID's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SID or NUE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
03β versus Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional's 2. 07β — meaning SID is approximately 100% more volatile than NUE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nucor Corporation (NUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 4% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SID or NUE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nucor Corporation grew EPS -11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -383. 3% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional. Over a 3-year CAGR, SID leads at -3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SID or NUE?
Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
4% net margin versus -5. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SID leads at 9. 1% versus 8. 2% for NUE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SID leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SID or NUE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) trades at 12.
5x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Nucor Corporation — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SID: 0. 0% to $1. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SID or NUE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) offers the highest yield at 27. 7%, versus 0. 9% for Nucor Corporation (NUE).
09Is SID or NUE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
03), 0. 9% yield, +416. 6% 10Y return). Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUE: +416. 6%, SID: +4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SID and NUE?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SID is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.