Steel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
Steel
Steel
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $33.75B | $51.64B | $18.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.42B | $19.01B | $34.16B | $14.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.56B | $1.37B | $2.33B | $806M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 14.0% | 14.0% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 9.4% | 10.0% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 15.6x | 16.2x | 18.9x |
| Total Debt | $57.10B | $4.21B | $7.12B | $1.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.31B | $770M | $2.26B | $217M |
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia Siderúrgi… (SID) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 877.0 | +777.0% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 536.4 | +436.4% |
| Reliance Steel & Al… (RS) | 100 | 380.6 | +280.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SID has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (12.1x vs 18.9x)
- 28.6% yield, vs RS's 1.3%
STLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs RS's 463.7%
- PEG 0.62 vs RS's 0.96
- 7.2% margin vs SID's -3.4%
- 8.5% ROA vs SID's -1.9%, ROIC 9.2% vs 6.1%
NUE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs SID's -3.9%
- +98.8% vs SID's -19.2%
RS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 4.88x
- Beta 0.75, yield 1.3%, current ratio 4.88x
- Beta 0.75 vs SID's 2.07, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs SID's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 18.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs SID's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs SID's 2.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 28.6% yield, vs RS's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +98.8% vs SID's -19.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs SID's -1.9%, ROIC 9.2% vs 6.1% |
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SID leads 1 • STLD leads 1 • NUE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SID and NUE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SID is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.4B annually — 3.1x RS's $14.8B. STLD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SID's -3.4%. On growth, NUE holds the edge at +21.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.4B | $19.0B | $34.2B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.7B | $2.4B | $4.9B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $1.4B | $2.3B | $806M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.4B | $665M | $532M | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +14.0% | +14.0% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +9.4% | +10.0% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +7.2% | +6.8% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +3.5% | +1.6% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +19.1% | +21.3% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | +93.1% | +3.8% | +36.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SID leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, RS trades at a 12% valuation discount to NUE's 30.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STLD offers better value at 1.15x vs RS's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $33.7B | $51.6B | $18.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $37.2B | $56.5B | $20.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.76x | 29.15x | 30.15x | 26.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.08x | 15.64x | 16.15x | 18.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.15x | 1.16x | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.48x | 18.34x | 13.65x | 15.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.86x | 1.59x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 3.87x | 2.37x | 2.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.81x | 67.29x | — | 37.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SID. RS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SID's 3.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs SID's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.8% | +15.3% | +10.6% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +8.5% | +6.7% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +9.2% | +7.7% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +10.9% | +8.9% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.69x | 0.47x | 0.32x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33.8B | $3.4B | $4.9B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.3B | $770M | $2.3B | $217M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57.1B | $4.2B | $7.1B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 20.39x | 29.72x | 18.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $38,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,916 for SID. Over the past 12 months, NUE leads with a +98.8% total return vs SID's -19.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STLD at 34.6% vs SID's -11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.1% | +32.6% | +34.2% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.2% | +79.8% | +98.8% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | +143.7% | +64.7% | +58.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.8% | +280.6% | +140.0% | +119.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.3% | +940.9% | +426.7% | +463.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.1% | +34.6% | +18.1% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
RS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RS is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SID's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RS currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SID's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.07x | 1.32x | 1.03x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.20 | $243.72 | $235.44 | $381.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $119.89 | $106.21 | $260.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +95.6% | +96.3% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 81.6 | 85.9 | 79.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 1.1M | 1.4M | 313K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SID and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SID as "Sell", STLD as "Buy", NUE as "Buy", RS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.7% upside for SID (target: $1) vs -19.1% for STLD (target: $188). For income investors, SID offers the higher dividend yield at 28.61% vs STLD's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.40 | $188.40 | $222.83 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 27 | 32 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +28.6% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.91 | $1.96 | $2.22 | $4.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +2.7% | +1.4% | +3.1% |
RS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). SID leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SID vs STLD vs NUE vs RS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SID or STLD or NUE or RS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
On trailing P/E, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Nucor Corporation at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is actually cheaper at 12. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Steel Dynamics, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +280. 6%, compared to -70. 8% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +940. 9% versus SID's +15. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional's 2. 07β — meaning SID is approximately 177% more volatile than RS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 4% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -3. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -383. 3% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional. Over a 3-year CAGR, SID leads at -3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -5. 9% for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SID leads at 9. 1% versus 7. 2% for RS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SID or STLD or NUE or RS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SID: 3. 7% to $1. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SID or STLD or NUE or RS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) offers the highest yield at 28. 6%, versus 0. 8% for Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD).
09Is SID or STLD or NUE or RS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +463. 7% 10Y return). Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +463. 7%, SID: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SID and STLD and NUE and RS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SID is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.