Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Aerospace & Defense
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Aerospace & Defense
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Business Services | Aerospace & Defense | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $97M | $529.86B | $182.12B | $29.22B | $238.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $72M | $92.18B | $6.27B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-25.02B | $2.27B | $950M | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 40.8% | 4.8% | 37.7% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | -121.4% | -5.9% | 19.1% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 53.6x | 10.0x | 4979.1x | 26.2x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $8.76B | $54.43B | $2.64B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $24.81B | $10.92B | $352M | $7.43B |
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIFCO Industries, I… (SIF) | 100 | 522.6 | +422.6% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 22.6 | -77.4% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 108.7 | +8.7% |
| Teledyne Technologi… (TDY) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +463.4% vs BA's +24.5%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.5x)
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
TDY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 1.64x
- 15.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 6.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs -0.1%
RTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.5%
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs TDY's 5.7%
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.51 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +463.4% vs BA's +24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs -0.1% |
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDY leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIF leads 2 • SPIR leads 0 • BA leads 0 • RTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 1288.3x SPIR's $72M. TDY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, SIF holds the edge at +14.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $72M | $92.2B | $6.3B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$74M | -$3.4B | $1.5B | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$25.0B | $2.3B | $950M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | -$16.2B | -$1.0B | $1.1B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +40.8% | +4.8% | +37.7% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -121.4% | -5.9% | +19.1% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | -349.6% | +2.5% | +15.1% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | -227.0% | -1.1% | +16.9% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | -26.9% | +14.0% | +7.6% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.3% | +59.5% | +31.3% | +21.6% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SIF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 89% valuation discount to BA's 93.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RTX's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SIF's 22.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $529.9B | $182.1B | $29.2B | $238.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $118M | $513.8B | $225.6B | $31.5B | $270.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -129.58x | 10.01x | 93.16x | 33.42x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.62x | — | 4979.09x | 26.20x | 25.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.73x | — | — | 21.20x | 20.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 7405.21x | 2.04x | 4.78x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 4.56x | 32.27x | 2.84x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 27.21x | 29.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | -88.4% | +2.9% | +8.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | -47.3% | +1.4% | +6.2% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | -0.1% | -9.5% | +7.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.4% | -0.1% | -9.1% | +8.7% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.08x | 9.97x | 0.25x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | -$16.1B | $43.5B | $2.3B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $24.8B | $10.9B | $352M | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $8.8B | $54.4B | $2.6B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 9.20x | 1.89x | 24.51x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SIF leads with a +463.4% total return vs BA's +24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIF at 88.5% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +172.3% | +106.4% | +1.4% | +21.6% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +463.4% | +73.1% | +24.5% | +31.0% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +570.3% | +198.1% | +17.1% | +52.6% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.1% | -79.6% | -1.9% | +44.7% | +120.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | -78.8% | +94.6% | +573.5% | +234.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +88.5% | +43.9% | +5.4% | +15.1% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDY and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDY currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 2.93x | 0.97x | 0.93x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.57 | $23.59 | $254.35 | $693.38 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.57 | $6.60 | $176.77 | $478.05 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +68.3% | +90.8% | +91.0% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 55.5 | 56.9 | 51.7 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 74K | 1.6M | 6.5M | 303K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SIF and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", BA as "Buy", TDY as "Buy", RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $263.67 | $711.33 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 54 | 18 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 0 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.43 | — | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.0% |
TDY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SIF vs SPIR vs BA vs TDY vs RTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus The Boeing Company at 93. 2x. On forward P/E, RTX Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +120.
1%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDY returned +563. 4% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 476% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, BA leads at 10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -0. 9% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDY leads at 18. 8% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RTX Corporation (RTX) trades at 25.
5x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4953. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 2% to $224. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX?
In this comparison, RTX (1.
5% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SIF, SPIR, TDY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SIF or SPIR or BA or TDY or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIF and SPIR and BA and TDY and RTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SIF (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and BA (Industrials) and TDY (Technology) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SIF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while SIF, SPIR, BA, TDY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.