SII vs NEM vs AEM vs WPM vs RGLD

For growth investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger pick with 83. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 15.

6x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited wins at 0. 36x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.

(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to +54. 2% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus NEM's +212. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Royal Gold, Inc.

(RGLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately 21% more volatile than RGLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Royal Gold, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is pulling ahead at 83. 3% versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. grew EPS 181. 2% year-over-year, compared to 32. 5% for Royal Gold, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WPM leads at 30. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 6% net margin versus 23. 2% for Sprott Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WPM leads at 68. 8% versus 33. 0% for SII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SII leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RGLD: 59. 0% to $330. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sprott Inc. (SII) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 6% for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Royal Gold, Inc.

(RGLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), 0. 8% yield, +234. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RGLD: +234. 8%, NEM: +212. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SII (Financial Services) and NEM (Basic Materials) and AEM (Basic Materials) and WPM (Basic Materials) and RGLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.