Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SIMA vs C
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
SIMA vs C — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $250M | $225.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $170.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $14.69B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 72.4x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $590.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $697K | $276.53B |
SIMA vs C — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIM Acquisition Cor… (SIMA) | 100 | 109.0 | +9.0% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 206.1 | +106.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIMA vs C
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIMA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.00
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, current ratio 25.28x
- Beta 0.00, current ratio 25.28x
C carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 236.6% 10Y total return vs SIMA's 9.0%
- NIM 2.3% vs SIMA's 2.3%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 72.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 72.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs SIMA's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs C's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.2% vs SIMA's +5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs C's 0.6% |
SIMA vs C — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SIMA vs C — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
C leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
C and SIMA operate at a comparable scale, with $170.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $170.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $24.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $14.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$768,460 | -$76.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +23.2% |
Valuation Metrics
C leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, C trades at a 70% valuation discount to SIMA's 72.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, C's 25.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SIMA's 52.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $250M | $225.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $249M | $539.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.40x | 21.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.47x | 25.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SIMA and C each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
C delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $2 for SIMA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), C scores 5/9 vs SIMA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,085 | $314.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $697,085 | $276.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $590.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
C leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in C five years ago would be worth $18,638 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,904 for SIMA. Over the past 12 months, C leads with a +87.2% total return vs SIMA's +5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors C at 43.1% vs SIMA's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +9.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.4% | +87.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.0% | +193.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.0% | +86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.0% | +236.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | +43.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIMA and C each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIMA is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. C currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SIMA's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.90 | $135.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $69.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.2% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 11.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
C is the only dividend payer here at 2.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $140.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
C leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
SIMA vs C: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIMA or C a better buy right now?
Citigroup Inc.
(C) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citigroup Inc. (C) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIMA or C?
On trailing P/E, Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus SIM Acquisition Corp. I at 72. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIMA or C?
Over the past 5 years, Citigroup Inc.
(C) delivered a total return of +86. 4%, compared to +9. 0% for SIM Acquisition Corp. I (SIMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: C returned +236. 6% versus SIMA's +9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIMA or C?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus Citigroup Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning C is approximately 45664% more volatile than SIMA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — SIMA or C?
Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for SIM Acquisition Corp. I — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: C leads at 10. 0% versus 0. 0% for SIMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — C leads at 41. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SIMA or C?
In this comparison, C (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SIMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SIMA or C better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Citigroup Inc. (C) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIMA: +9. 0%, C: +236. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SIMA and C?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
C pays a dividend while SIMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.