SIMAW
SIM Acquisition Corp. I
Shell Companies
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.+122.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SIMAW vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+81.5%
SIMAW vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SIMAW | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $6M | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $697K | $182.09B |
SIMAW vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SIMAW
GS
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIM Acquisition Cor… (SIMAW) | 100 | 222.3 | +122.3% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIMAW vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SIMAW and GS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SIMAW
SIM Acquisition Corp. I
The Banking Pick
SIMAW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 25.28x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 25.28x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 11.3% margin vs SIMAW's 2.3%
- 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +70.6% vs SIMAW's +0.1%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | SIMAW | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 15.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | GS | 11.3% margin vs SIMAW's 2.3% |
| Stability / Safety | SIMAW | Beta 0.82 vs GS's 1.47 |
| Dividends | GS | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GS | +70.6% vs SIMAW's +0.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SIMAW | 3.8% ROA vs GS's 0.9% |
SIMAW vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
SIMAW vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGSLAGGINGSIMAW
SIMAWSIM Acquisition Corp.…
1leads
GSThe Goldman Sachs Gro…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SIMAWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GS1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SIMAW3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GS2/2
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and SIMAW operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$951,211 | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.0% | +45.8% |
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
SIMAW leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.3x trailing earnings, SIMAW trades at a 94% valuation discount to GS's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIMAW's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GS's 34.8x.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.33x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.15x | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SIMAW leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SIMAW and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for SIMAW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 4/9 vs SIMAW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,085 | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $697,085 | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.31x |
Evenly matched — SIMAW and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs SIMAW's +0.1%.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +43.5% |
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIMAW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIMAW is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs SIMAW's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.60 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 2.0M |
Evenly matched — SIMAW and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SIMAWSIM Acquisition C… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SIMAW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallThe Goldman Sachs Group, In… (GS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SIMAW vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIMAW or GS a better buy right now?
SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) a "Hold" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIMAW or GS?
On trailing P/E, SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the cheapest at 1. 3x versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. at 22. 8x.
03Which is safer — SIMAW or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 80% more volatile than SIMAW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — SIMAW or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for SIM Acquisition Corp. I — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14. 5% versus 0. 0% for SIMAW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SIMAW or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SIMAW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is SIMAW or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +534. 3% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SIMAW and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SIMAW is a small-cap deep-value stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while SIMAW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(SIMAW: 1.3x · GS: 22.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.