Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SIMAW vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
SIMAW vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $485M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $697K | $1.35B |
SIMAW vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIM Acquisition Cor… (SIMAW) | 100 | 222.3 | +122.3% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIMAW vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIMAW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 25.28x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 25.28x
In this particular matchup, PSFE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs PSFE's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.1% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs PSFE's -3.8% |
SIMAW vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SIMAW vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIMAW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and SIMAW operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$951,211 | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.0% | -183.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SIMAW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SIMAW's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSFE's 4.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $485M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.33x | -2.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.15x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIMAW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIMAW delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSFE scores 4/9 vs SIMAW's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$697,085 | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $697,085 | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SIMAW and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, SIMAW leads with a +0.1% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.1% | -37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -34.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -92.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIMAW and PSFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIMAW is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSFE currently trades 56.9% from its 52-week high vs SIMAW's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.60 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.9% |
SIMAW leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
SIMAW vs PSFE: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIMAW or PSFE a better buy right now?
SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — SIMAW or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 35β — meaning PSFE is approximately 187% more volatile than SIMAW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — SIMAW or PSFE?
SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus 0. 0% for SIMAW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSFE leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — SIMAW or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is SIMAW or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIM Acquisition Corp.
I (SIMAW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between SIMAW and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SIMAW (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SIMAW is a small-cap deep-value stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare PSFE vs EVTC
EVTC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PSFE.
Compare SIMAW vs ACIC
ACIC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SIMAW.
Expand With EVTC + ACIC
EVTC and ACIC are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.