Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $9M | $1690.08T | $5.83B | $73M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $133M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-168M | $153M | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | — | 65.4% | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | — | 12.3% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $22M | $70M | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M | $1.12B | $6M |
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sintx Technologies,… (SINT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SINT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.94
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs SINT's -5.1%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -12.0% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs SINT's -13.6%
- 5.4% ROA vs SINT's -159.9%, ROIC 18.9% vs -253.2%
XTNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.5%
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.35x
- 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Beta 0.67 vs SINT's 1.94, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs SINT's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SINT's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs SINT's -5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs SINT's -159.9%, ROIC 18.9% vs -253.2% |
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
XTNT leads 1 • SINT leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SINT's -13.6%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $1.6B | $133M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$112M | $212M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$168M | $153M | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$151M | $392M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | — | +65.4% | +62.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | — | +12.3% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | — | +9.8% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | — | +25.1% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.3% | — | +28.2% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.2% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +123.7% |
Valuation Metrics
XTNT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $1690.08T | $5.8B | $73M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $1690.08T | $4.8B | $102M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | -0.75x | 24.47x | -4.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.52x | — | 3.95x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 0.65x | 3.25x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SINT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SINT's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | -130.2% | +8.8% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -159.9% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | — | +18.9% | -12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -162.4% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -17.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$898,000 | -$172M | -$1.0B | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M | $1.1B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $22M | $70M | $35M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -181.30x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,165 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SINT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs SINT's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 5.7% vs SINT's -79.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.5% | +3.6% | +23.8% | -30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.1% | +100.5% | +15.2% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +18.1% | +13.2% | -20.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -68.3% | +61.7% | -68.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.1% | -12.0% | -98.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -79.9% | +5.7% | +4.2% | -7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and XTNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SINT's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs SINT's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.78 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $0.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.99 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $0.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.4% | +75.3% | +95.6% | +54.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 47.4 | 60.5 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 252K | 2.2M | 147K |
Analyst Outlook
SINT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 31.5% for ALKS (target: $46).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 28 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XTNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SINT vs DBVT vs ALKS vs XTNT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +61.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -12. 0% versus SINT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Sintx Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning SINT is approximately 188% more volatile than XTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 111% for Sintx Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -18. 3% for Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sintx Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 59. 4% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XTNT leads at 28. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -1678. 1% for Sintx Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -1053. 1% for SINT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SINT or DBVT or ALKS or XTNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67)). Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTNT: -98. 0%, SINT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SINT and DBVT and ALKS and XTNT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SINT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTNT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.