Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $1K | $312K | $426M | $414M | $24.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $1M | $784M | $265M | $55.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-19M | $48M | $244M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 6.9% | 38.8% | 35.2% | 3.5% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | -143.5% | -10.6% | 8.2% | -82.4% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 12.4x | — | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $1M | $53M | $508M | $8.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366K | $490K | $49M | $208M | $1.23B |
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shineco, Inc. (SISI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AgriFORCE Growing S… (AGRI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SISI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.8%, EPS growth 41.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.0%
- 16.8% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
Among these 5 stocks, AGRI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VITL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.31
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.31, current ratio 2.16x
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 17.0x)
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs AGRI's -14.4%
- 39.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs -98.0%
TSN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 23.1% 10Y total return vs VITL's -73.0%
- 2.9% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +26.8% vs SISI's -99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.8% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 17.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs AGRI's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs AGRI's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs SISI's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs -98.0% |
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VITL leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSN leads 1 • SISI leads 0 • AGRI leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VITL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 41301.6x AGRI's $1M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRI's -14.4%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $1M | $784M | $265M | $55.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$13M | $78M | -$187M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$19M | $48M | $244M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$9M | -$90M | -$134M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +38.8% | +35.2% | +3.5% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.5% | -10.6% | +8.2% | -82.4% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -14.4% | +6.1% | +92.2% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | -6.8% | -11.4% | -50.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.0% | — | +15.4% | -15.3% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.0% | +12.6% | -108.1% | +90.9% | +36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SISI and VITL each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 87% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VITL's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TSN's 11.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1,352 | $311,837 | $426M | $414M | $24.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $1M | $431M | $714M | $31.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.02x | 6.61x | -0.49x | 49.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.38x | — | 16.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.17x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 4.22x | — | 11.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.59x | 0.56x | 1.50x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.05x | 1.25x | — | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 20.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-160 for AGRI. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SISI's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -149.3% | -159.9% | +14.5% | — | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.5% | -117.7% | +10.0% | +39.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.6% | -98.0% | +26.9% | -44.4% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.6% | -117.1% | +26.1% | -40.3% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.24x | 0.15x | — | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $995,040 | $5M | $300M | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366,140 | $489,868 | $49M | $208M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $1M | $53M | $508M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.13x | -7.20x | 39.83x | -11.47x | 2.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSN five years ago would be worth $9,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SISI. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +26.8% total return vs SISI's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.3% vs AGRI's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -52.4% | -68.1% | +1.3% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -95.4% | -73.5% | -64.9% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -38.2% | -93.1% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -54.4% | -99.2% | -1.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -73.0% | -98.6% | +23.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.4% | -96.9% | -14.8% | -59.1% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SISI and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SISI is the less volatile stock with a -0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGRI's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SISI's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.50x | 2.22x | 0.33x | 1.82x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.50 | $19.26 | $53.13 | $7.69 | $69.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.55 | $8.40 | $0.50 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +4.0% | +17.9% | +11.6% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 30.6 | 38.9 | 60.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 133 | 387K | 3.3M | 59.5M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGRI as "Buy", VITL as "Buy", BYND as "Sell", TSN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 10.4% for TSN (target: $75). TSN is the only dividend payer here at 2.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $24.89 | $44.55 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 16 | 21 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
VITL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TSN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SISI vs AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs TSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the stronger pick with 1681% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Vital Farms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
Over the past 5 years, Tyson Foods, Inc.
(TSN) delivered a total return of -1. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Shineco, Inc. (SISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSN returned +23. 8% versus SISI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 50β versus AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. 's 2. 22β — meaning AGRI is approximately -548% more volatile than SISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 81% for Shineco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is pulling ahead at 1681% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SISI leads at 48. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -239. 7% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VITL leads at 11. 6% versus -153. 2% for AGRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VITL leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for Tyson Foods, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN?
In this comparison, TSN (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SISI, AGRI, VITL, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SISI or AGRI or VITL or BYND or TSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 50)). AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SISI: -100. 0%, AGRI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SISI and AGRI and VITL and BYND and TSN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SISI (Healthcare) and AGRI (Consumer Defensive) and VITL (Consumer Defensive) and BYND (Consumer Defensive) and TSN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TSN pays a dividend while SISI, AGRI, VITL, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.