Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $21.99B | $11.53B | $27.00B | $4.08B | $11.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $380M | $840M | $1.07B | $446M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $68M | $177M | $17M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 42.1% | 55.3% | 53.9% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | 12.7% | 16.0% | 4.6% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 106.1x | 60.3x | 73.3x | 58.7x | 71.9x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $45M | $538M | $0.00 | $552M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $103M | $112M | $59M | $152M |
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SiTime Corporation (SITM) | 100 | 2794.6 | +2694.6% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 587.5 | +487.5% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1133.5 | +1033.5% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SITM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 63.1% 10Y total return vs FORM's 20.0%
- 61.2% revenue growth vs FORM's 2.8%
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.05, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 4.50x
- +393.4% vs POWI's +43.3%
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.69, current ratio 3.71x
- 16.5% margin vs SITM's -6.4%
- Beta 1.69 vs SMTC's 2.75, lower leverage
- 8.6% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -4.9%
POWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.11, yield 1.1%
- Lower P/E (58.7x vs 71.9x)
- 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, SMTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.2% revenue growth vs FORM's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (58.7x vs 71.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs SITM's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.69 vs SMTC's 2.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +393.4% vs POWI's +43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs -4.9% |
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MTSI leads 2 • SITM leads 1 • FORM leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SITM and MTSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2.8x SITM's $380M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SITM's -6.4%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $380M | $840M | $1.1B | $446M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $152M | $223M | $41M | $173M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $68M | $177M | $17M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | -$5M | $168M | $85M | $143M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +42.1% | +55.3% | +53.9% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +12.7% | +16.0% | +4.6% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +8.1% | +16.5% | +3.7% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | -0.6% | +15.6% | +18.9% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.3% | +32.0% | +22.5% | +2.6% | +12.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.2% | +2.2% | +42.9% | -60.0% | +67.4% |
Valuation Metrics
POWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 187.9x trailing earnings, POWI trades at a 12% valuation discount to FORM's 214.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, POWI's 81.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 142.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.0B | $11.5B | $27.0B | $4.1B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.0B | $11.5B | $27.4B | $4.0B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -484.35x | 214.30x | -492.99x | 187.90x | -53.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 106.11x | 60.27x | 73.25x | 58.74x | 71.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 103.18x | 142.12x | 81.32x | 104.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 67.32x | 14.68x | 27.91x | 9.20x | 12.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.99x | 11.18x | 20.06x | 6.13x | 16.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 626.05x | 981.87x | 140.00x | 46.85x | 256.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SITM. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +6.7% | +13.2% | +2.4% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +5.6% | +8.6% | +2.1% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +5.4% | +6.0% | +2.4% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.1% | +6.1% | +7.6% | +2.9% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.04x | 0.41x | — | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$58M | $426M | -$59M | $400M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $103M | $112M | $59M | $152M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $45M | $538M | $0 | $552M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 252.69x | 32.37x | — | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $99,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +393.4% total return vs POWI's +43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 113.9% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +125.2% | +149.8% | +105.7% | +97.0% | +61.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +342.0% | +393.4% | +200.8% | +43.3% | +250.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +878.0% | +428.7% | +554.9% | -4.5% | +549.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +899.9% | +306.8% | +577.7% | -1.3% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6308.3% | +1997.4% | +836.0% | +239.0% | +462.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +113.9% | +74.2% | +87.1% | -1.5% | +86.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs POWI's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 2.05x | 1.69x | 2.11x | 2.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $845.00 | $159.09 | $364.00 | $81.59 | $127.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $173.14 | $26.08 | $117.05 | $30.86 | $34.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +92.9% | +98.9% | +89.8% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 86.8 | 61.8 | 79.1 | 61.3 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 433K | 1.6M | 1.1M | 982K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SITM as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", MTSI as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -28.2% for SMTC (target: $87). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $619.29 | $123.38 | $332.00 | $79.00 | $87.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +2.4% | 0.0% |
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MTSI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SITM vs FORM vs MTSI vs POWI vs SMTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 187. 9x trailing P/E (58. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiTime Corporation (SITM) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
On trailing P/E, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the cheapest at 187. 9x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 214. 3x. On forward P/E, Power Integrations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 58. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +899.
9%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +63. 1% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 75β — meaning SMTC is approximately 63% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.
2% versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus -18. 5% for SITM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) trades at 58. 7x forward P/E versus 106. 1x for SiTime Corporation — 47. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SITM, FORM, MTSI, SMTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SITM or FORM or MTSI or POWI or SMTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1997% 10Y return). SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1997%, SITM: +63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SITM and FORM and MTSI and POWI and SMTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FORM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while SITM, FORM, MTSI, SMTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.