Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corporation

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$47M
5Y Perf.-83.8%
BILI
Bilibili Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$7.32B
5Y Perf.-32.2%
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.-67.3%
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-92.7%
HUYA
HUYA Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$481M
5Y Perf.-79.4%

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SJ logoSJ
BILI logoBILI
MOMO logoMOMO
IQ logoIQ
HUYA logoHUYA
IndustryBroadcastingElectronic Gaming & MultimediaInternet Content & InformationEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$47M$7.32B$2.16B$1.18B$481M
Revenue (TTM)$1.26B$29.38B$10.29B$27.11B$6.11B
Net Income (TTM)$-587M$220M$800M$-390M$-153M
Gross Margin18.3%35.9%37.7%21.9%12.7%
Operating Margin-6.2%1.1%12.7%1.7%-3.4%
Forward P/E3.1x1.1x4.8x4.0x
Total Debt$14M$5.15B$129M$14.19B$49M
Cash & Equiv.$308M$10.25B$5.44B$3.53B$1.19B

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SJ
BILI
MOMO
IQ
HUYA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Scienjoy Holding Co… (SJ)10016.2-83.8%
Bilibili Inc. (BILI)10067.8-32.2%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)10032.7-67.3%
iQIYI, Inc. (IQ)1007.3-92.7%
HUYA Inc. (HUYA)10020.6-79.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MOMO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. HUYA Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. SJ and BILI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SJ
Scienjoy Holding Corporation
The Defensive Pick

SJ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.04, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 3.60x
  • Beta 0.04 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
The Growth Play

BILI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 72.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
  • 19.1% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
Best for: growth exposure
MOMO
Hello Group Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • -9.4% 10Y total return vs BILI's 95.6%
  • Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
  • Lower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x)
  • 7.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
IQ
iQIYI, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, IQ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
HUYA
HUYA Inc.
The Income Pick

HUYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 56.7%
  • 56.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +26.9% vs IQ's -36.0%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBILI logoBILI19.1% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
ValueMOMO logoMOMOLower P/E (1.1x vs 4.0x)
Quality / MarginsMOMO logoMOMO7.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4%
Stability / SafetySJ logoSJBeta 0.04 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage
DividendsHUYA logoHUYA56.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MOMO's 4.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HUYA logoHUYA+26.9% vs IQ's -36.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MOMO logoMOMO5.3% ROA vs SJ's -62.6%, ROIC 10.9% vs -9.6%

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SJScienjoy Holding Corporation
FY 2025
Technology Service
100.0%$38M
BILIBilibili Inc.
FY 2024
Value Added Services
44.4%$11.0B
Advertising
33.0%$8.2B
Mobile Game Services
22.6%$5.6B
MOMOHello Group Inc.
FY 2024
Live Video Service
49.5%$4.8B
Value-added Services
49.4%$4.8B
Mobile Marketing
1.1%$105M
Other Services
0.0%$3M
Mobile Games
0.0%$432,000
IQiQIYI, Inc.
FY 2024
Membership
60.8%$17.8B
Advertising
19.6%$5.7B
Service, Other
9.9%$2.9B
Content Distribution
9.7%$2.8B
HUYAHUYA Inc.
FY 2024
Revenue Sharing Fees And Content Costs
95.1%$4.6B
Bandwidth Costs
4.9%$237M

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHUYALAGGINGIQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BILI and MOMO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BILI is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 23.3x SJ's $1.3B. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJ's -46.4%. On growth, BILI holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$29.4B$10.3B$27.1B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$104M$845M$1.4B$6.3B-$120M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$587M$220M$800M-$390M-$153M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$3.3B$685M$466M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.3%+35.9%+37.7%+21.9%+12.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.2%+1.1%+12.7%+1.7%-3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-46.4%+0.8%+7.8%-1.4%-2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.6%+11.2%+6.7%+1.7%-1.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.5%+19.8%-5.1%-7.8%+1.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.0%+134.9%+32.1%-2.1%-118.5%
Evenly matched — BILI and MOMO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.3x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 13% valuation discount to IQ's 10.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILI's 38.6x.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
Market CapShares × price$47M$7.3B$2.2B$1.2B$481M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$6.6B$1.4B$2.7B$314M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.53x-46.31x9.34x10.69x-103.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.06x1.08x4.83x3.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple38.62x6.91x10.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.26x1.86x1.46x0.27x0.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.53x4.42x0.66x0.60x0.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.56x11.69x21.90x4.13x
Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-75 for SJ. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BILI scores 7/9 vs IQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-74.7%+1.6%+7.2%-2.9%-2.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-62.6%+0.6%+5.3%-0.9%-1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.6%-8.4%+10.9%+5.8%-1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.5%-8.1%+10.8%+7.8%-2.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.36x0.01x1.06x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$294M-$5.1B-$5.3B$10.7B-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$308M$10.2B$5.4B$3.5B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$5.1B$129M$14.2B$49M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.10x18.04x0.77x
MOMO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HUYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUYA at 25.9% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.1%-16.6%+1.6%-40.4%+5.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.3%+25.0%+16.2%-36.0%+26.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.5%+10.0%-5.7%-79.6%+99.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.5%-78.4%-36.7%-91.2%-60.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%+95.6%-9.4%-92.2%-60.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.8%+3.2%-1.9%-41.1%+25.9%
HUYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILI's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 68.8% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.04x1.77x0.78x1.43x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.63$36.40$9.22$2.84$4.93
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$17.45$5.68$1.07$2.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.5%+60.4%+68.8%+42.6%+64.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.343.461.245.654.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded40K2.4M648K11.1M1.0M
Evenly matched — SJ and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HUYA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BILI as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy", IQ as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.5% upside for IQ (target: $2) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, HUYA offers the higher dividend yield at 56.67% vs MOMO's 4.61%.

MetricSJ logoSJScienjoy Holding …BILI logoBILIBilibili Inc.MOMO logoMOMOHello Group Inc.IQ logoIQiQIYI, Inc.HUYA logoHUYAHUYA Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.00$8.10$2.16$3.45
# AnalystsCovering analysts24162215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.6%+56.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.99$12.34
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+5.1%0.0%+7.6%
HUYA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HUYA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). MOMO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallHUYA Inc. (HUYA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SJ vs BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs HUYA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bilibili Inc.

(BILI) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bilibili Inc. (BILI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus iQIYI, Inc. at 10. 7x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BILI returned +95. 6% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Bilibili Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning BILI is approximately 3969% more volatile than SJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bilibili Inc.

(BILI) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1572. 7% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -47. 3% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -6. 4% for SJ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOMO leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.

(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for iQIYI, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQ: 78. 5% to $2. 16.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA?

In this comparison, HUYA (56.

7% yield), MOMO (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SJ, BILI, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SJ or BILI or MOMO or IQ or HUYA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04)). Bilibili Inc. (BILI) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SJ: -88. 8%, BILI: +95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SJ and BILI and MOMO and IQ and HUYA?

These companies operate in different sectors (SJ (Communication Services) and BILI (Technology) and MOMO (Communication Services) and IQ (Communication Services) and HUYA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MOMO, HUYA pay a dividend while SJ, BILI, IQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SJ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BILI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MOMO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 22.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SJ and BILI and MOMO and IQ and HUYA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SJ: -3.5% · BILI: 19.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.