Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Construction
Construction
Residential Construction
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction | Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $7M | $78.98B | $14.51B | $8.79B | $5.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $23.94B | $7.68B | $14.82B | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $727K | $2.60B | $837M | $292M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | 49.1% | 35.4% | 29.9% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 16.1% | 16.8% | 4.2% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.0x | 16.8x | 18.0x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $14.53B | $3.44B | $5.65B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $719K | $207M | $647M | $182M | $322M |
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skyline Builders Gr… (SKBL) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKBL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SHW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 2.1% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- Beta 0.79 vs SKBL's 1.85
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 27.0x), PEG 3.38 vs 3.90
- 10.9% margin vs SKBL's 1.6%
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IBP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, current ratio 3.03x
- PEG 0.82 vs SHW's 3.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 27.0x), PEG 3.38 vs 3.90 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs SKBL's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SKBL's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs SKBL's -70.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4% |
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKBL leads 1 • IBP leads 1 • SHW leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.9B annually — 520.2x SKBL's $46M. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKBL's 1.6%. On growth, SHW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $23.9B | $7.7B | $14.8B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $4.5B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $656M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.6B | $837M | $292M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $2.9B | $943M | $862M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +49.1% | +35.4% | +29.9% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.2% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +10.9% | +10.9% | +2.0% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +12.1% | +12.3% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.8% | +6.5% | -10.1% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.5% | +20.7% | -151.2% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKBL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.6x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 40% valuation discount to SHW's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $79.0B | $14.5B | $8.8B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $93.3B | $17.3B | $14.3B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 31.18x | 18.63x | 20.43x | 22.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.99x | 16.79x | 18.03x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.51x | 3.76x | 2.59x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 21.24x | 12.18x | 10.35x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 3.35x | 1.92x | 0.58x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 17.33x | 201.40x | 2.04x | 8.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.76x | 16.76x | 10.30x | 19.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. BLDR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +58.2% | +8.0% | +6.9% | +37.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +10.0% | +15.9% | +2.6% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +16.5% | +35.4% | +6.4% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.8% | +21.3% | +35.9% | +8.5% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 3.16x | 45.81x | 1.30x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $14.3B | $2.8B | $5.5B | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $718,625 | $207M | $647M | $182M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $14.5B | $3.4B | $5.6B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | 7.83x | 12.60x | 2.19x | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,189 for SKBL. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs SKBL's -70.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | -2.1% | +12.1% | -24.0% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.7% | -8.0% | +21.1% | -25.0% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +42.4% | +40.1% | -30.1% | +98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +16.1% | +16.1% | +51.8% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +250.0% | +152.1% | +614.8% | +650.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.4% | +12.5% | +11.9% | -11.2% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHW and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKBL's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs SKBL's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.80x | 1.28x | 1.66x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.25 | $379.65 | $79.19 | $151.03 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $301.58 | $58.16 | $73.40 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +84.3% | +90.8% | +52.6% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 47.6 | 59.6 | 42.8 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 1.6M | 2.7M | 2.4M | 344K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHW and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHW as "Buy", MAS as "Buy", BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.2% upside for BLDR (target: $107) vs 14.8% for MAS (target: $83). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs SHW's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $389.43 | $82.60 | $106.64 | $251.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 38 | 38 | 43 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +1.7% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 12 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.17 | $1.24 | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +4.7% | +3.0% |
MAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SKBL vs SHW vs MAS vs BLDR vs IBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger pick with 2.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.
6x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Masco Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +80. 6%, compared to -28. 1% for Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited (SKBL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus SKBL's -29. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited's 1. 77β — meaning SKBL is approximately 120% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 130% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is pulling ahead at 2.
1% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus 1. 6% for Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 3. 4% for SKBL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Masco Corporation (MAS) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 34. 2% to $106. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield), SHW (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SKBL, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKBL or SHW or MAS or BLDR or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 1. 0% yield, +246. 5% 10Y return). Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited (SKBL) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +246. 5%, SKBL: -29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKBL and SHW and MAS and BLDR and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKBL (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials) and MAS (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
SHW, MAS, IBP pay a dividend while SKBL, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.