Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Industrial Materials
Gold
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Gold | Gold | Industrial Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $3.66B | $11.33B | $7.02B | $1.18B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.85B | $279M | $0.00 | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-114M | $225M | $207M | $-16M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.0% | 83.7% | — | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 23.8% | 71.0% | — | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | 18.2x | — | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $1.55B | $9M | $0.00 | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $407M | $142M | $133M | $242M |
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skeena Resources Li… (SKE) | 100 | 291.0 | +191.0% |
| Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) | 100 | 248.4 | +148.4% |
| OR Royalties Inc. (OR) | 100 | 347.7 | +247.7% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 186.4 | +86.4% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 375.2 | +275.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.3% 10Y total return vs HL's 360.6%
EQX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 4.53x
- PEG 0.29 vs EQX's 0.34
- Beta 0.54, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.53x
Among these 5 stocks, VZLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5%
- +271.0% vs VZLA's +51.1%
- 16.3% ROA vs SKE's -17.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs -357.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs VZLA's -245.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.3% margin vs VZLA's 0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs VZLA's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs VZLA's +51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs SKE's -17.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs -357.8% |
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OR leads in 2 of 6 categories
EQX leads 1 • HL leads 1 • SKE leads 1 • VZLA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQX and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. OR is the more profitable business, keeping 74.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EQX's 12.2%. On growth, OR holds the edge at +66.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.8B | $279M | $0 | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$77M | $966M | $235M | -$34M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$114M | $225M | $207M | -$16M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$285M | -$7M | $210M | -$45M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +25.0% | +83.7% | — | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +23.8% | +71.0% | — | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.2% | +74.3% | — | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -0.4% | +75.2% | — | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.2% | +66.4% | — | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | +3.3% | +4.9% | +11.9% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EQX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.7x trailing earnings, OR trades at a 15% valuation discount to EQX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OR offers better value at 0.55x vs EQX's 1.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $11.3B | $7.0B | $1.2B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $12.5B | $6.9B | $1.1B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.98x | 39.92x | 33.74x | -159.19x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.00x | 18.20x | — | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x | 0.55x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.91x | 28.31x | — | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.13x | 24.89x | — | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 45.15x | 1.57x | 4.96x | 3.06x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 33.08x | — | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-134 for SKE. OR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQX's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs SKE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -134.1% | +4.5% | +14.1% | -3.1% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.7% | +2.4% | +12.7% | -3.1% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | +5.7% | +12.2% | -7.2% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.1% | +5.8% | +14.2% | -7.2% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.27x | 0.01x | — | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$83M | $1.1B | -$133M | -$133M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $407M | $142M | $133M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $1.6B | $9M | $0 | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -49.83x | 1.73x | 55.06x | — | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OR five years ago would be worth $28,481 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,057 for VZLA. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs VZLA's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKE at 61.6% vs OR's 29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | +5.0% | +6.5% | -37.9% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.3% | +110.6% | +57.1% | +51.1% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.9% | +151.5% | +117.1% | +134.9% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.0% | +60.5% | +184.8% | +40.6% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1028.7% | +236.5% | +217.0% | +40.6% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.6% | +36.0% | +29.5% | +32.9% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKE and OR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OR is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VZLA's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKE currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.86x | 0.67x | 1.47x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.77 | $18.96 | $48.06 | $7.19 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.92 | $5.61 | $22.40 | $2.23 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +75.8% | +77.9% | +47.7% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 50.2 | 50.1 | 51.3 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 767K | 8.9M | 1.0M | 7.5M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
OR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKE as "Buy", EQX as "Buy", OR as "Buy", VZLA as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.1% upside for VZLA (target: $7) vs 18.8% for OR (target: $45). OR is the only dividend payer here at 0.50% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $44.50 | $7.00 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.19 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
OR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). EQX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SKE vs EQX vs OR vs VZLA vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). OR Royalties Inc. (OR) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Skeena Resources Limited (SKE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
On trailing P/E, OR Royalties Inc.
(OR) is the cheapest at 33. 7x versus Equinox Gold Corp. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Equinox Gold Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: OR Royalties Inc. wins at 0. 29x versus Equinox Gold Corp. 's 0. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
Over the past 5 years, OR Royalties Inc.
(OR) delivered a total return of +184. 8%, compared to +40. 6% for Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKE returned +1087% versus VZLA's +45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OR Royalties Inc.
(OR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Hecla Mining Company's 1. 51β — meaning HL is approximately 125% more volatile than OR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OR Royalties Inc. (OR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 27% for Equinox Gold Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 22. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OR Royalties Inc. grew EPS 825. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 1% for Equinox Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
OR Royalties Inc.
(OR) is the more profitable company, earning 74. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Vizsla Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 74. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OR leads at 72. 9% versus 0. 0% for VZLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OR leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, OR Royalties Inc. (OR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Equinox Gold Corp. 's 0. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZLA: 104. 1% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL?
In this comparison, OR (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SKE, EQX, VZLA, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKE or EQX or OR or VZLA or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OR Royalties Inc.
(OR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 0. 5% yield, +224. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OR: +224. 9%, VZLA: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKE and EQX and OR and VZLA and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EQX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OR is a small-cap high-growth stock; VZLA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. OR pays a dividend while SKE, EQX, VZLA, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.