Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $72M | $734M | $1.06B | $1.80B | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $516M | $790M | $774M | $1.27B | $855M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $4M | $-64M | $130M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 65.6% | 54.8% | 37.4% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | -0.5% | -11.4% | 14.0% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.1x | 15.2x | 11.0x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $589M | $10M | $5M | $109M | $105M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $231M | $793M | $141M | $132M |
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) | 100 | 3.4 | -96.6% |
| Udemy, Inc. (UDMY) | 100 | 18.3 | -81.7% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 324.3 | +224.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKIL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UDMY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 12.0x)
COUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
STRA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.46 vs PRDO's 1.77
- 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs STRA's 114.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs SKIL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.4% vs SKIL's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs -8.1% |
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories
SKIL leads 1 • UDMY leads 0 • COUR leads 0 • STRA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.5x SKIL's $516M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKIL's -26.0%. On growth, COUR holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $516M | $790M | $774M | $1.3B | $855M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $21M | -$67M | $216M | $247M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $4M | -$64M | $130M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $73M | $84M | $174M | $221M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +65.6% | +54.8% | +37.4% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | -0.5% | -11.4% | +14.0% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | +0.5% | -8.2% | +10.2% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +9.3% | +10.8% | +13.7% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -3.0% | +9.1% | +0.8% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.7% | +76.2% | -140.0% | +19.4% | +30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SKIL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 93% valuation discount to UDMY's 195.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.94x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $734M | $1.1B | $1.8B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $561M | $513M | $274M | $1.8B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.56x | 195.72x | -20.23x | 14.59x | 14.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.07x | 15.19x | 11.01x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.94x | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 22.51x | — | 7.22x | 8.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.93x | 1.40x | 1.42x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 3.59x | 1.62x | 1.10x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.24x | 9.13x | 9.90x | 11.68x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SKIL. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIL's 6.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UDMY scores 8/9 vs SKIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +1.7% | -10.1% | +7.9% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | +0.6% | -6.4% | +6.2% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | -56.7% | — | +9.0% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | -1.2% | -12.6% | +10.7% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.28x | 0.05x | 0.01x | 0.07x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $488M | -$221M | -$788M | -$32M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $231M | $793M | $141M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $589M | $10M | $5M | $109M | $105M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.69x | 18.19x | — | — | 50.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $414 for SKIL. Over the past 12 months, PRDO leads with a +15.4% total return vs SKIL's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs SKIL's -30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | -9.7% | -11.4% | +1.4% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | -22.7% | -28.5% | -7.8% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | -43.9% | -44.6% | +3.8% | +195.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -81.7% | -82.7% | +17.8% | +198.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -81.7% | -86.1% | +114.9% | +505.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.1% | -17.5% | -17.9% | +1.3% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs SKIL's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.21x | 0.80x | 0.48x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.01 | $8.09 | $13.56 | $93.45 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $4.01 | $5.00 | $69.70 | $26.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +62.2% | +46.2% | +84.6% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 50.3 | 50.4 | 47.3 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 1.4M | 4.7M | 315K | 584K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRA and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UDMY as "Hold", COUR as "Buy", STRA as "Buy", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for COUR (target: $8) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs PRDO's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $7.79 | $87.00 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 17 | 18 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.2% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.52 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +6.9% | 0.0% | +7.7% | +5.6% |
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SKIL vs UDMY vs COUR vs STRA vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coursera, Inc. (COUR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Udemy, Inc. at 195. 7x. On forward P/E, Udemy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.
5%, compared to -95. 9% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus SKIL's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Skillsoft Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning SKIL is approximately 248% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Skillsoft Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Udemy, Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to 10. 5% for Perdoceo Education Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COUR leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -23. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -13. 1% for SKIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKIL leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Udemy, Inc. (UDMY) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Coursera, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COUR: 24. 2% to $7. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
2% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SKIL, UDMY, COUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKIL or UDMY or COUR or STRA or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, SKIL: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKIL and UDMY and COUR and STRA and PRDO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UDMY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. STRA, PRDO pay a dividend while SKIL, UDMY, COUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.