Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SKM vs CHA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
SKM vs CHA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $14.15B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.84T | $13.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.01T | $1.80B |
| Gross Margin | 90.2% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 1.2x |
| Total Debt | $10.76T | $548M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.02T | $4.75B |
SKM vs CHA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 170.8 | +70.8% |
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKM vs CHA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.9%
- 239.6% 10Y total return vs CHA's -63.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 91.0%, current ratio 0.81x
CHA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 167.4%, EPS growth 214.4%
- 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's 1.9%
- 13.6% margin vs SKM's 5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 1.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SKM's 5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.3% vs CHA's -65.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs SKM's 3.5% |
SKM vs CHA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SKM and CHA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.84T annually — 1344.4x CHA's $13.3B. CHA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 5.7%. On growth, SKM holds the edge at -1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.84T | $13.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.20T | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.01T | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.07T | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.2% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | -9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -75.7% | -41.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 68% valuation discount to SKM's 16.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHA's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKM's 5.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.2B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.2B | $703M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.78x | 5.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 1.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.44x | 1.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.77x | 4.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.15x | 3.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $8 for SKM. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKM's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs SKM's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +99.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.74T | -$4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.02T | $4.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.76T | $548M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.87x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $20,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,647 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +72.3% total return vs CHA's -65.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKM at 24.9% vs CHA's -28.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +79.5% | -11.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.3% | -65.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.0% | -63.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.7% | -63.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.6% | -63.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.9% | -28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKM is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.46 | $36.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.66 | $8.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +30.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 486K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SKM as "Hold" and CHA as "Buy". SKM is the only dividend payer here at 3.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2118.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.3% |
CHA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SKM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SKM vs CHA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKM or CHA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKM or CHA?
On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.
4x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 16. 8x. On forward P/E, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKM or CHA?
Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +102. 7%, compared to -63. 5% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 6% versus CHA's -63. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKM or CHA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 79β — meaning CHA is approximately 134% more volatile than SKM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 91% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKM or CHA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.
4% versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 16. 3% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKM or CHA?
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 7. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23. 3% versus 9. 4% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKM leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKM or CHA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 1. 2x for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKM or CHA?
In this comparison, SKM (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKM or CHA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.
,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 9% yield, +239. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 6%, CHA: -63. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKM and CHA?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKM (Communication Services) and CHA (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock. SKM pays a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.