Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$13.93B
5Y Perf.+68.1%
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-67.2%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.-22.0%
KT
KT Corporation

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$10.11B
5Y Perf.+7.7%

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKM logoSKM
CHA logoCHA
NFLX logoNFLX
KT logoKT
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicEntertainmentTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$13.93B$1.32B$374.00B$10.11B
Revenue (TTM)$17.10T$13.27B$45.18B$28.21T
Net Income (TTM)$407.83B$1.80B$10.98B$1.73T
Gross Margin88.0%47.2%48.5%67.1%
Operating Margin11.9%15.3%29.5%8.7%
Forward P/E0.0x1.2x24.8x0.0x
Total Debt$10.77T$548M$14.46B$12.21T
Cash & Equiv.$1.49T$4.75B$9.03B$3.51T

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKM
CHA
NFLX
KT
StockApr 25May 26Return
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)100168.1+68.1%
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)10032.8-67.2%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)10078.0-22.0%
KT Corporation (KT)100107.7+7.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SKM and NFLX are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Netflix, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. KT and CHA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Income Pick

SKM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
  • 239.9% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
  • Beta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79
  • +77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
The Growth Play

CHA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 167.4%, EPS growth 214.4%
  • 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • 24.3% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
  • 19.8% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 3.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
KT
KT Corporation
The Value Pick

KT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.

  • PEG 0.00 vs NFLX's 0.75
  • Beta 0.42, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.20x
  • Lower P/E (0.0x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.75
  • 3.8% yield, vs SKM's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA logoCHA167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
ValueKT logoKTLower P/E (0.0x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.75
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
Stability / SafetySKM logoSKMBeta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79
DividendsKT logoKT3.8% yield, vs SKM's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SKM logoSKM+77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 3.8%

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
KTKT Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSKMLAGGINGKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.21T annually — 2126.2x CHA's $13.3B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17.10T$13.3B$45.2B$28.21T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.58T$2.0B$30.1B$6.39T
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$407.8B$1.8B$11.0B$1.73T
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.33T$2.0B$9.5B$984.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.0%+47.2%+48.5%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+15.3%+29.5%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.4%+13.6%+24.3%+6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.8%+14.7%+20.9%+3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.1%-9.4%+17.6%+3.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.7%-41.8%+31.1%+127.8%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CHA and KT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 89% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 0.00x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
Market CapShares × price$13.9B$1.3B$374.0B$10.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20.3B$706M$379.4B$16.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.50x5.46x34.89x8.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x1.20x24.80x0.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.00x1.06x0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.41x1.63x12.61x3.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.17x0.73x8.28x0.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x4.98x14.32x0.79x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.75x3.47x39.53x10.76x
Evenly matched — CHA and KT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKM's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs SKM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.4%+20.8%+41.3%+9.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+15.1%+19.8%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.8%+29.8%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+99.8%+30.5%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95877
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.86x0.20x0.54x0.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.28T-$4.2B$5.4B$8.70T
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.49T$4.8B$9.0B$3.51T
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.77T$548M$14.5B$12.21T
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.80x17.33x6.61x
CHA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SKM and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SKM five years ago would be worth $19,652 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,656 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs CHA's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs CHA's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.6%-10.7%-3.0%+11.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+77.0%-63.0%-23.6%+10.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.2%-63.4%+166.5%+99.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+96.5%-63.4%+75.2%+88.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+239.9%-63.4%+875.3%+97.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.3%-28.5%+38.6%+25.9%
Evenly matched — SKM and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SKM is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 31.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.34x0.79x0.39x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.46$35.42$134.12$24.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.66$8.98$75.01$17.54
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.7%+31.0%+65.8%+85.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.155.835.341.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M488K44.0M1.4M
SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SKM as "Hold", CHA as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", KT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 27.4% for CHA (target: $14). For income investors, KT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs SKM's 3.15%.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdCHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.KT logoKTKT Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$116.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts715995
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1661.27$1161.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.3%+2.4%+1.7%
KT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CHA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallSK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKM vs CHA vs NFLX vs KT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.

5x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, KT Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KT Corporation wins at 0. 00x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

Over the past 5 years, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) delivered a total return of +96. 5%, compared to -63. 4% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus CHA's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 79β — meaning CHA is approximately 134% more volatile than SKM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 86% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.

4% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KT Corporation grew EPS 277. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, KT Corporation (KT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KT Corporation (KT) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT?

In this comparison, KT (3.

8% yield), SKM (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CHA, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SKM or CHA or NFLX or KT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +239. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 9%, CHA: -63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKM and CHA and NFLX and KT?

These companies operate in different sectors (SKM (Communication Services) and CHA (Consumer Defensive) and NFLX (Communication Services) and KT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; KT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SKM, KT pay a dividend while CHA, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKM and CHA and NFLX and KT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKM: -4.1% · CHA: -9.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(SKM: 2.4% · CHA: 13.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SKM: 51.5x · CHA: 5.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.