Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$13.93B
5Y Perf.+68.1%
KT
KT Corporation

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$10.11B
5Y Perf.+7.7%
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$24.57B
5Y Perf.+58.4%
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-67.2%
PHI
PLDT Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • PH
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.-13.3%

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKM logoSKM
KT logoKT
VIV logoVIV
CHA logoCHA
PHI logoPHI
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$13.93B$10.11B$24.57B$1.32B$4.40B
Revenue (TTM)$17.10T$28.21T$59.83B$13.27B$218.49B
Net Income (TTM)$407.83B$1.73T$6.20B$1.80B$30.02B
Gross Margin88.0%67.1%43.6%47.2%71.6%
Operating Margin11.9%8.7%15.8%15.3%29.3%
Forward P/E0.0x0.0x2.8x1.2x0.1x
Total Debt$10.77T$12.21T$20.75B$548M$359.04B
Cash & Equiv.$1.49T$3.51T$6.69B$4.75B$11.86B

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKM
KT
VIV
CHA
PHI
StockApr 25May 26Return
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)100168.1+68.1%
KT Corporation (KT)100107.7+7.7%
Telefônica Brasil S… (VIV)100158.4+58.4%
Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA)10032.8-67.2%
PLDT Inc. (PHI)10086.7-13.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PHI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SKM and KT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Long-Run Compounder

SKM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 239.9% 10Y total return vs VIV's 81.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 85.8%, current ratio 1.03x
  • +77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KT
KT Corporation
The Growth Play

KT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 277.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • PEG 0.00 vs VIV's 1.03
  • Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.03
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, VIV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
CHA
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares
The Growth Leader

CHA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.

  • 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
  • 15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%
Best for: growth and efficiency
PHI
PLDT Inc.
The Income Pick

PHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 7.9%
  • Beta 0.21, yield 7.9%, current ratio 0.44x
  • 13.7% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
  • Beta 0.21 vs CHA's 0.79
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCHA logoCHA167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
ValueKT logoKTLower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.03
Quality / MarginsPHI logoPHI13.7% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
Stability / SafetyPHI logoPHIBeta 0.21 vs CHA's 0.79
DividendsPHI logoPHI7.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KT's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SKM logoSKM+77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CHA logoCHA15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

KTKT Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A.
FY 2025
Services
90.0%$74.1B
Sale Of Goods
10.0%$8.3B
CHAChagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

PHIPLDT Inc.
FY 2024
Service Revenue
100.0%$208.4B

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCHALAGGINGVIV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — VIV and PHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

KT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.21T annually — 2126.2x CHA's $13.3B. PHI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, VIV holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17.10T$28.21T$59.8B$13.3B$218.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.58T$6.39T$24.5B$2.0B$108.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$407.8B$1.73T$6.2B$1.8B$30.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.33T$984.0B$11.3B$2.0B$35.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+88.0%+67.1%+43.6%+47.2%+71.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+8.7%+15.8%+15.3%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.4%+6.1%+10.4%+13.6%+13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.8%+3.5%+18.9%+14.7%+16.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.1%+3.6%+8.7%-9.4%-1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.7%+127.8%+11.1%-41.8%+17.3%
Evenly matched — VIV and PHI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KT and CHA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 89% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 0.00x vs VIV's 8.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
Market CapShares × price$13.9B$10.1B$24.6B$1.3B$4.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20.3B$16.1B$27.4B$706M$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.50x8.45x22.53x5.46x8.72x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x0.01x2.78x1.20x0.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.00x0.39x8.38x1.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.41x3.64x5.93x1.63x5.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.17x0.51x2.18x0.73x1.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.61x0.79x1.79x4.98x2.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.75x10.76x11.53x3.47x11.19x
Evenly matched — KT and CHA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

PHI delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PHI's 2.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs PHI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.4%+9.1%+9.0%+20.8%+24.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+4.1%+4.8%+15.1%+4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.8%+6.9%+7.8%+9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+8.4%+8.6%+99.8%+12.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.86x0.63x0.30x0.20x2.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.28T$8.70T$14.1B-$4.2B$347.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.49T$3.51T$6.7B$4.8B$11.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.77T$12.21T$20.7B$548M$359.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.80x6.61x15.03x
CHA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VIV five years ago would be worth $20,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,656 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs CHA's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIV at 26.6% vs CHA's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.6%+11.0%+27.9%-10.7%-3.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+77.0%+10.6%+60.1%-63.0%-7.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.2%+99.5%+103.0%-63.4%+16.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+96.5%+88.7%+108.8%-63.4%+11.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+239.9%+97.1%+81.5%-63.4%+7.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.3%+25.9%+26.6%-28.5%+5.2%
Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SKM and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 31.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.34x0.42x0.53x0.79x0.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.46$24.58$17.25$35.42$24.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.66$17.54$9.41$8.98$18.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.7%+85.3%+89.1%+31.0%+83.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.141.249.355.845.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.4M989K488K137K
Evenly matched — SKM and PHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SKM as "Hold", KT as "Buy", VIV as "Hold", CHA as "Buy", PHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for CHA (target: $14) vs 7.3% for VIV (target: $17). For income investors, PHI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.87% vs VIV's 2.03%.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdKT logoKTKT CorporationVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…CHA logoCHAChagee Holdings L…PHI logoPHIPLDT Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts7512154
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+3.8%+2.0%+7.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1661.27$1161.87$1.54$97.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+2.3%+2.3%0.0%
PHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CHA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). PHI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallChagee Holdings Limited Ame… (CHA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKM vs KT vs VIV vs CHA vs PHI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KT Corporation (KT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.

5x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, KT Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KT Corporation wins at 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

Over the past 5 years, Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) delivered a total return of +108. 8%, compared to -63. 4% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 9% versus CHA's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 79β — meaning CHA is approximately 272% more volatile than PHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.

4% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KT Corporation grew EPS 277. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIV leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHI leads at 59. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, KT Corporation (KT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KT Corporation (KT) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 2. 8x for Telefônica Brasil S. A. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 27. 4% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI?

In this comparison, PHI (7.

9% yield), KT (3. 8% yield), SKM (3. 2% yield), VIV (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SKM or KT or VIV or CHA or PHI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +239. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 9%, CHA: -63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKM and KT and VIV and CHA and PHI?

These companies operate in different sectors (SKM (Communication Services) and KT (Communication Services) and VIV (Communication Services) and CHA (Consumer Defensive) and PHI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VIV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock. SKM, KT, VIV, PHI pay a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VIV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PHI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKM and KT and VIV and CHA and PHI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKM: -4.1% · KT: 3.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(SKM: 2.4% · KT: 6.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SKM: 51.5x · KT: 8.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.