Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Tanger Inc. (SKT) vs The Macerich Company (MAC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SKT | 13.3% revenue growth vs MAC's 10.4% |
| Quality / Margins | SKT | 19.2% net margin vs MAC's -19.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SKT | Beta 0.78 vs MAC's 1.27 |
| Dividends | SKT | 2.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; MAC pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAC | +17.2% vs SKT's +7.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SKT | 4.1% ROA vs MAC's -13.0%, ROIC 5.3% vs 20.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates outlet shopping centers across the United States and Canada. It generates revenue primarily through tenant leases—collecting rent from retailers—with additional income from property management and development services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on the outlet shopping segment and its established portfolio of well-located properties in tourist destinations and high-traffic markets.
Macerich is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates regional shopping malls across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through leasing retail space to tenants—collecting base rents, percentage rents based on tenant sales, and common area maintenance charges—with its portfolio concentrated in high-density coastal markets. The company's competitive advantage lies in its premium portfolio of Class-A malls in affluent, densely populated regions—particularly the West Coast and Northeast corridor—which attract high-quality tenants and shoppers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SKT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.8x SKT's $562M. SKT is the more profitable business, keeping 19.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAC's -19.4%. On growth, SKT holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $562M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $250M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | -$197M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $248M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.5% | +95.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +67.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | -19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +29.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | +92.1% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAC's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKT's 19.8x.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.11x | -26.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.24x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.80x | 4.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.11x | 5.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.06x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKT scores 7/9 vs MAC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | -13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.22x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.48x | 2.43x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SKT five years ago would be worth $26,009 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,138 for MAC. Over the past 12 months, MAC leads with a +17.2% total return vs SKT's +7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKT at 28.8% vs MAC's 23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.6% | +86.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.1% | +81.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.4% | -54.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +23.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SKT is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAC's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.95 | $20.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.69 | $12.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.8 | 67.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 876K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SKT as "Hold" and MAC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for MAC (target: $21) vs -4.7% for SKT (target: $35). SKT is the only dividend payer here at 2.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SKTTanger Inc. | MACThe Macerich Comp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.33 | $20.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 100 | 261.84 | +161.8% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | 100 | 91.94 | -8.1% |
Tanger Inc. (SKT) returned +160% over 5 years vs The Macerich Company (MAC)'s +81%. A $10,000 investment in SKT 5 years ago would be worth $26,009 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | $466M | $526M | +12.9% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | $1.0B | $1.0B | -2.6% |
The Macerich Company's revenue grew from $1.0B (2016) to $1.0B (2025) — a -0.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 41.6% | 18.7% | -54.9% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | 49.7% | -19.4% | -139.2% |
The Macerich Company's net margin went from 50% (2016) to -19% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 37.3 | 38.8 | +4.0% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | 63.2 | 255.2 | +303.8% |
Tanger Inc. has traded in a 23x–237x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~42x. The Macerich Company has traded in a 40x–255x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~-26x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger Inc. (SKT) | 2.01 | 0.88 | -56.2% |
| The Macerich Company (MAC) | 3.59 | -0.78 | -121.7% |
The Macerich Company's EPS grew from $3.59 (2016) to $-0.78 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Tanger Inc. generated $156M FCF in 2024 (-9% vs 2021). The Macerich Company generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021).
SKT vs MAC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKT or MAC a better buy right now?
Tanger Inc. (SKT) offers the better valuation at 42.1x trailing P/E (33.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tanger Inc. (SKT) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SKT or MAC?
Over the past 5 years, Tanger Inc. (SKT) delivered a total return of +160.1%, compared to +81.4% for The Macerich Company (MAC). A $10,000 investment in SKT five years ago would be worth approximately $26K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKT returned +49.4% versus MAC's -54.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SKT or MAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tanger Inc. (SKT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.78β versus The Macerich Company's 1.27β — meaning MAC is approximately 62% more volatile than SKT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — SKT or MAC?
Tanger Inc. (SKT) is the more profitable company, earning 18.7% net margin versus -19.4% for The Macerich Company — meaning it keeps 18.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAC leads at 67.8% versus 28.6% for SKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAC leads at 95.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is SKT or MAC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAC: 1.8% to $20.83.
06Which pays a better dividend — SKT or MAC?
In this comparison, SKT (2.9% yield) pays a dividend. MAC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SKT or MAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tanger Inc. (SKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.78), 2.9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKT: +49.4%, MAC: -54.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SKT and MAC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SKT pays a dividend while MAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.