Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.05B | $3.17B | $4.57B | $22.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.64B | $3.94B | $2.20B | $16.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $214M | $136M | $269M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 22.5% | 23.4% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 7.0% | 9.8% | 16.4% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 18.2x | 20.2x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $131M | $1.64B | $45M | $2.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $610M | $26M | $356M | $2.01B |
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 295.0 | +195.0% |
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 275.8 | +175.8% |
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 253.6 | +153.6% |
| PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) | 100 | 344.1 | +244.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs PHM's 5.7%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs PHM's -3.5%
PATK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.93 vs CVCO's 1.20
CVCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 12.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5%
- 18.2% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.6%
PHM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.71 vs CVCO's 0.98
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.2x), PEG 0.71 vs 0.98
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs PHM's -3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 20.2x), PEG 0.71 vs 0.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PATK's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs CVCO's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PHM's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.6% vs SKY's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs PATK's 4.4%, ROIC 19.4% vs 7.6% |
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PHM leads in 1 of 6 categories
CVCO leads 1 • PATK leads 1 • SKY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SKY and CVCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PHM is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.8B annually — 7.6x CVCO's $2.2B. CVCO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PATK's 3.5%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $3.9B | $2.2B | $16.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $306M | $445M | $221M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $214M | $136M | $269M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $260M | $194M | $205M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +22.5% | +23.4% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +7.0% | +9.8% | +16.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +3.5% | +12.2% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +4.9% | +9.3% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | -0.6% | +11.3% | -12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -0.9% | -19.1% | -30.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PHM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, PHM trades at a 57% valuation discount to PATK's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PHM offers better value at 0.64x vs CVCO's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $3.2B | $4.6B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $4.8B | $4.3B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.43x | 24.45x | 23.29x | 10.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.44x | 18.24x | 20.24x | 11.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.78x | — | 1.13x | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.69x | 10.72x | 20.32x | 7.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.63x | 0.80x | 2.27x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 2.79x | 3.74x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.29x | 12.86x | 29.09x | 12.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $12 for PATK. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs PHM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +11.6% | +24.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.1% | +4.4% | +18.2% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | +7.6% | +19.4% | +17.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +10.2% | +17.4% | +20.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.39x | 0.04x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$479M | $1.6B | -$311M | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $610M | $26M | $356M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $131M | $1.6B | $45M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 51.32x | 3.40x | 211.73x | 5590.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PATK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,662 for PATK. Over the past 12 months, PATK leads with a +19.6% total return vs SKY's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs SKY's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | -13.2% | -18.5% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.3% | +19.6% | -7.0% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.6% | +128.2% | +57.7% | +76.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.0% | +56.6% | +123.5% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +714.5% | +395.2% | +448.0% | +571.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.9% | +31.7% | +16.4% | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PATK and PHM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PATK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHM currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs PATK's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.93x | 1.20x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.17 | $148.50 | $713.01 | $144.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.44 | $80.35 | $393.53 | $95.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +64.2% | +67.6% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 42.8 | 46.2 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 500K | 469K | 142K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PATK and PHM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKY as "Buy", PATK as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy", PHM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). For income investors, PATK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.67% vs PHM's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $106.00 | $126.50 | $475.00 | $141.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 17 | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.60 | — | $0.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.0% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
PHM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CVCO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SKY vs PATK vs CVCO vs PHM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
On trailing P/E, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, PulteGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PulteGroup, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to +56. 6% for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +714. 5% versus PATK's +395. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning CVCO is approximately 29% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -3. 5% for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -24. 3% for PulteGroup, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVCO leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Cavco Industries, Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM?
In this comparison, PATK (1.
7% yield), PHM (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SKY, CVCO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKY or PATK or CVCO or PHM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PulteGroup, Inc.
(PHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 0. 8% yield, +571. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHM: +571. 2%, CVCO: +448. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKY and PATK and CVCO and PHM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PHM is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PATK, PHM pay a dividend while SKY, CVCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.