Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYE vs CRBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
SKYE vs CRBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $30M | $137M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $-79M |
| Total Debt | $274K | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $28M |
SKYE vs CRBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skye Bioscience, In… (SKYE) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Corbus Pharmaceutic… (CRBP) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYE vs CRBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYE is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 6.7% margin vs CRBP's 3.3%
CRBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.22
- EPS growth -60.3%
- -85.3% 10Y total return vs SKYE's -99.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -98.4% revenue growth vs SKYE's -112.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.7% margin vs CRBP's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs SKYE's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.8% vs SKYE's -51.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -57.9% ROA vs SKYE's -119.9%, ROIC -51.4% vs -6.0% |
SKYE vs CRBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYE and CRBP operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | -$84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | -$79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.2B | -$64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | -60.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CRBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $137M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $111M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | -1.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRBP leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRBP delivers a -65.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-66 in annual profit, vs $-144 for SKYE. CRBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKYE's 0.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRBP scores 2/9 vs SKYE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -143.6% | -65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.9% | -57.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | -51.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -131.4% | -58.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $273,646 | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRBP five years ago would be worth $2,327 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $388 for SKYE. Over the past 12 months, CRBP leads with a +64.8% total return vs SKYE's -51.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRBP at 2.7% vs SKYE's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | +39.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.8% | +64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -76.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -85.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | +2.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CRBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRBP is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYE's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRBP currently trades 53.3% from its 52-week high vs SKYE's 15.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $20.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $6.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.0% | +53.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 568K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CRBP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SKYE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
SKYE vs CRBP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYE or CRBP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(CRBP) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SKYE or CRBP?
Over the past 5 years, Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(CRBP) delivered a total return of -76. 7%, compared to -96. 1% for Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRBP returned -85. 3% versus SKYE's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SKYE or CRBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(CRBP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Skye Bioscience, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SKYE is approximately 75% more volatile than CRBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (CRBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 1% for Skye Bioscience, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SKYE or CRBP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS -60. 3% year-over-year, compared to -93. 2% for Skye Bioscience, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SKYE or CRBP?
Skye Bioscience, Inc.
(SKYE) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYE leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CRBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKYE leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SKYE or CRBP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SKYE or CRBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(CRBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRBP: -85. 3%, SKYE: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SKYE and CRBP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.