Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $23.61B | $2.47B | $8.76B | $39.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $1.57B | $959M | $2.00B | $6.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $220M | $-51M | $414M | $885M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 23.2% | 11.3% | 52.8% | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 12.4% | -3.8% | 23.0% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 70.2x | 62.2x | 18.9x | 38.5x |
| Total Debt | $250M | $162M | $186M | $134M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $235M | $98M | $801M | $1.81B |
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
| Tower Semiconductor… (TSEM) | 100 | 658.9 | +558.9% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 162.9 | +62.9% |
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) | 100 | 212.4 | +112.4% |
| GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.67
- Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth 18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- 29.2% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6%
- 26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
TSEM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs CRUS's 421.3%
- +483.5% vs CRUS's +77.6%
ICHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CRUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 7.37x
- PEG 1.06 vs TSEM's 3.40
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 7.37x
- Lower P/E (18.9x vs 38.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, GFS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.2% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.9x vs 38.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +483.5% vs CRUS's +77.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC -0.3% vs -3.9% |
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRUS leads in 3 of 6 categories
TSEM leads 1 • SKYT leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • GFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 15.4x SKYT's $442M. SKYT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, SKYT holds the edge at +126.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $1.6B | $959M | $2.0B | $6.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $496M | -$11M | $486M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $220M | -$51M | $414M | $885M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$41M | -$17M | $637M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +23.2% | +11.3% | +52.8% | +25.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +12.4% | -3.8% | +23.0% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +14.1% | -5.3% | +20.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -2.6% | -1.7% | +31.9% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.6% | +13.7% | +4.7% | +5.7% | 0.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +42.9% | +46.2% | +19.1% | +127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, SKYT trades at a 87% valuation discount to TSEM's 108.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRUS offers better value at 1.31x vs TSEM's 5.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $23.6B | $2.5B | $8.8B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $23.5B | $2.6B | $8.1B | $39.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.55x | 108.25x | -46.25x | 21.90x | 44.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 70.18x | 62.25x | 18.94x | 38.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.25x | — | 1.31x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 53.69x | 47.34x | — | 16.64x | 18.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 15.08x | 2.61x | 4.38x | 5.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.22x | 8.21x | 3.67x | 4.22x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 13.76x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYT delivers a 93.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $94 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. TSEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKYT's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRUS scores 8/9 vs SKYT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +93.8% | +7.6% | -7.5% | +20.2% | +7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.8% | +6.6% | -5.2% | +17.1% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +5.4% | -3.9% | +22.9% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +20.8% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.06x | 0.28x | 0.06x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $227M | -$74M | $87M | -$667M | -$171M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $235M | $98M | $801M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250M | $162M | $186M | $134M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.99x | — | -5.97x | 703.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSEM five years ago would be worth $73,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, TSEM leads with a +483.5% total return vs CRUS's +77.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSEM at 69.9% vs GFS's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.4% | +72.5% | +249.0% | +43.5% | +92.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +356.0% | +483.5% | +329.1% | +77.6% | +101.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.3% | +390.8% | +151.1% | +120.0% | +18.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | +636.8% | +28.9% | +124.1% | +52.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.4% | +1578.7% | +629.1% | +421.3% | +52.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.9% | +69.9% | +35.9% | +30.1% | +5.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and CRUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs TSEM's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 2.41x | 3.93x | 1.12x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.27 | $232.67 | $72.87 | $179.00 | $76.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.02 | $35.42 | $13.12 | $91.32 | $31.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +90.3% | +97.7% | +95.9% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 58.7 | 66.9 | 58.5 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.9M | 795K | 600K | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SKYT and TSEM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYT as "Hold", TSEM as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", CRUS as "Buy", GFS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for SKYT (target: $35) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $154.00 | $49.80 | $145.00 | $51.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 14 | 14 | 22 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
CRUS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSEM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the stronger pick with 29. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
On trailing P/E, SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. at 108. 2x. On forward P/E, Cirrus Logic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cirrus Logic, Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. 's 3. 40x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
Over the past 5 years, Tower Semiconductor Ltd.
(TSEM) delivered a total return of +636. 8%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSEM returned +1579% versus GFS's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cirrus Logic, Inc.
(CRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 252% more volatile than CRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 128% for SkyWater Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is pulling ahead at 29. 2% versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWater Technology, Inc. grew EPS 1843% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYT leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
SkyWater Technology, Inc.
(SKYT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRUS leads at 23. 0% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRUS leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. 's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) trades at 18. 9x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for Tower Semiconductor Ltd. — 51. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYT: 5. 9% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.
(CRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +421. 3% 10Y return). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRUS: +421. 3%, SKYT: +86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYT and TSEM and ICHR and CRUS and GFS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TSEM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.