Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKYT
SkyWater Technology, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.63B
5Y Perf.-3.4%
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$23.61B
5Y Perf.+558.9%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+62.9%
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.76B
5Y Perf.+112.4%
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39.47B
5Y Perf.+45.5%

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKYT logoSKYT
TSEM logoTSEM
ICHR logoICHR
CRUS logoCRUS
GFS logoGFS
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$1.63B$23.61B$2.47B$8.76B$39.47B
Revenue (TTM)$442M$1.57B$959M$2.00B$6.79B
Net Income (TTM)$119M$220M$-51M$414M$885M
Gross Margin20.0%23.2%11.3%52.8%25.2%
Operating Margin0.4%12.4%-3.8%23.0%11.7%
Forward P/E13.5x70.2x62.2x18.9x38.5x
Total Debt$250M$162M$186M$134M$1.64B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$235M$98M$801M$1.81B

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKYT
TSEM
ICHR
CRUS
GFS
StockOct 21May 26Return
SkyWater Technology… (SKYT)10096.6-3.4%
Tower Semiconductor… (TSEM)100658.9+558.9%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100162.9+62.9%
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS)100212.4+112.4%
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)100145.5+45.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SKYT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cirrus Logic, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. TSEM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKYT
SkyWater Technology, Inc.
The Income Pick

SKYT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.67
  • Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth 18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
  • 29.2% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6%
  • 26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TSEM
Tower Semiconductor Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

TSEM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 15.8% 10Y total return vs CRUS's 421.3%
  • +483.5% vs CRUS's +77.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Technology Pick

ICHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CRUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 7.37x
  • PEG 1.06 vs TSEM's 3.40
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 7.37x
  • Lower P/E (18.9x vs 38.5x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GFS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSKYT logoSKYT29.2% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6%
ValueCRUS logoCRUSLower P/E (18.9x vs 38.5x)
Quality / MarginsSKYT logoSKYT26.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Stability / SafetyCRUS logoCRUSBeta 1.12 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TSEM logoTSEM+483.5% vs CRUS's +77.6%
Efficiency (ROA)SKYT logoSKYT21.8% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC -0.3% vs -3.9%

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKYTSkyWater Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Wafer Services
73.7%$201M
Advanced Technology Services, Fixed Price
25.6%$70M
Advanced Technology Services, Other
0.7%$2M
TSEMTower Semiconductor Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.
FY 2025
Portable Audio Products
60.0%$1.1B
High-Performance Mixed Signal Products
40.0%$759M
GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
FY 2025
Engineering And Other Pre-Fabrication Services
100.0%$769M

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCRUSLAGGINGGFS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CRUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 15.4x SKYT's $442M. SKYT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, SKYT holds the edge at +126.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$442M$1.6B$959M$2.0B$6.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$37M$496M-$11M$486M$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$119M$220M-$51M$414M$885M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$53M-$41M-$17M$637M$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.0%+23.2%+11.3%+52.8%+25.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%+12.4%-3.8%+23.0%+11.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.9%+14.1%-5.3%+20.7%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.0%-2.6%-1.7%+31.9%+14.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+126.6%+13.7%+4.7%+5.7%0.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.3%+42.9%+46.2%+19.1%+127.3%
CRUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, SKYT trades at a 87% valuation discount to TSEM's 108.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRUS offers better value at 1.31x vs TSEM's 5.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$23.6B$2.5B$8.8B$39.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$23.5B$2.6B$8.1B$39.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.55x108.25x-46.25x21.90x44.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.70.18x62.25x18.94x38.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.25x1.31x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple53.69x47.34x16.64x18.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x15.08x2.61x4.38x5.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.22x8.21x3.67x4.22x3.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.76x39.11x
CRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CRUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SKYT delivers a 93.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $94 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. TSEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKYT's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRUS scores 8/9 vs SKYT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+93.8%+7.6%-7.5%+20.2%+7.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.8%+6.6%-5.2%+17.1%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.3%+5.4%-3.9%+22.9%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.4%+6.6%-4.7%+20.8%+5.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926387
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.28x0.06x0.28x0.06x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$227M-$74M$87M-$667M-$171M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$235M$98M$801M$1.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$250M$162M$186M$134M$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.99x-5.97x703.54x
CRUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TSEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TSEM five years ago would be worth $73,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, TSEM leads with a +483.5% total return vs CRUS's +77.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSEM at 69.9% vs GFS's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.4%+72.5%+249.0%+43.5%+92.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+356.0%+483.5%+329.1%+77.6%+101.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+243.3%+390.8%+151.1%+120.0%+18.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.3%+636.8%+28.9%+124.1%+52.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+86.4%+1578.7%+629.1%+421.3%+52.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+50.9%+69.9%+35.9%+30.1%+5.9%
TSEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ICHR and CRUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CRUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs TSEM's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.67x2.41x3.93x1.12x1.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.27$232.67$72.87$179.00$76.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.02$35.42$13.12$91.32$31.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+90.3%+97.7%+95.9%+92.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.458.766.958.580.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M2.9M795K600K4.2M
Evenly matched — ICHR and CRUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SKYT and TSEM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SKYT as "Hold", TSEM as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", CRUS as "Buy", GFS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for SKYT (target: $35) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50).

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…TSEM logoTSEMTower Semiconduct…ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CRUS logoCRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$154.00$49.80$145.00$51.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts614142219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — SKYT and TSEM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CRUS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSEM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKYT vs TSEM vs ICHR vs CRUS vs GFS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SkyWater Technology, Inc.

(SKYT) is the stronger pick with 29. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

On trailing P/E, SkyWater Technology, Inc.

(SKYT) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. at 108. 2x. On forward P/E, Cirrus Logic, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cirrus Logic, Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. 's 3. 40x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

Over the past 5 years, Tower Semiconductor Ltd.

(TSEM) delivered a total return of +636. 8%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSEM returned +1579% versus GFS's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 252% more volatile than CRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 128% for SkyWater Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWater Technology, Inc.

(SKYT) is pulling ahead at 29. 2% versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWater Technology, Inc. grew EPS 1843% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYT leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

SkyWater Technology, Inc.

(SKYT) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRUS leads at 23. 0% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRUS leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Tower Semiconductor Ltd. 's 3. 40x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) trades at 18. 9x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for Tower Semiconductor Ltd. — 51. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYT: 5. 9% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SKYT or TSEM or ICHR or CRUS or GFS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +421. 3% 10Y return). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRUS: +421. 3%, SKYT: +86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKYT and TSEM and ICHR and CRUS and GFS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SKYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TSEM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKYT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 63%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSEM

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRUS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GFS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKYT and TSEM and ICHR and CRUS and GFS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKYT: 126.6% · TSEM: 13.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(SKYT: 26.9% · TSEM: 14.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SKYT: 13.5x · TSEM: 108.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.