Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYW vs UAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
SKYW vs UAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $3.52B | $32.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.12B | $60.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $429M | $3.67B |
| Gross Margin | 41.9% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.39B | $31.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $5.94B |
SKYW vs UAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 273.4 | +173.4% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 355.6 | +255.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYW vs UAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.49
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 282.0% 10Y total return vs UAL's 118.1%
UAL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.3% vs SKYW's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs UAL's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs UAL's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs UAL's 2.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.3% vs SKYW's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs UAL's 4.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs 9.1% |
SKYW vs UAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKYW vs UAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SKYW and UAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.5B annually — 14.7x SKYW's $4.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.4% (SKYW) to 6.1% (UAL). On growth, UAL holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $60.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $967M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $429M | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $339M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, SKYW trades at a 13% valuation discount to UAL's 9.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKYW's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UAL's 7.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $32.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $57.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.47x | 9.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.01x | 10.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.02x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.27x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $16 for SKYW. SKYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAL's 2.03x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $25.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $31.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.88x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SKYW and UAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,693 for SKYW. Over the past 12 months, UAL leads with a +32.3% total return vs SKYW's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYW at 47.4% vs UAL's 29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.6% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.4% | +117.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.9% | +82.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.0% | +118.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.4% | +29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKYW and UAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKYW is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UAL currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs SKYW's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.94 | $119.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.00 | $71.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.7% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 379K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SKYW as "Buy" and UAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for SKYW (target: $122) vs 36.5% for UAL (target: $136).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $122.00 | $136.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +2.0% |
SKYW leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
SKYW vs UAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYW or UAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYW or UAL?
On trailing P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. at 9. 8x. On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYW or UAL?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +82. 2%, compared to +76. 9% for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +282. 0% versus UAL's +118. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYW or UAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning UAL is approximately 51% more volatile than SKYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 2% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYW or UAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus 3. 5% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWest, Inc. grew EPS 33. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYW leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYW or UAL?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus 5. 7% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus 8. 0% for UAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYW or UAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYW: 39. 2% to $122. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYW or UAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SKYW or UAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+282. 0% 10Y return). United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKYW: +282. 0%, UAL: +118. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYW and UAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.