Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYW vs MESA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
SKYW vs MESA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $3.34B | $879M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.12B | $381M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $429M | $-166M |
| Gross Margin | 41.9% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | -44.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.39B | $103M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $42M |
SKYW vs MESA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
| Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA) | 100 | 646.2 | +546.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYW vs MESA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 268.6% 10Y total return vs MESA's 78.7%
- 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9%
MESA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.82
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 30.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs MESA's -43.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs SKYW's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.0% vs SKYW's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs -62.9% |
SKYW vs MESA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKYW vs MESA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 10.8x MESA's $381M. SKYW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MESA's -43.6%. On growth, SKYW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $381M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $967M | -$150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $429M | -$166M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $339M | -$53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | -44.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | -43.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | -21.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +43.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $879M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.04x | -0.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.61x | 30.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 1.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.65x | 63.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYW leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MESA. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKYW scores 8/9 vs MESA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | -5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -71.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | -62.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | -86.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $103M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.88x | -8.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MESA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESA five years ago would be worth $18,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,977 for SKYW. Over the past 12 months, MESA leads with a +1900.0% total return vs SKYW's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MESA at 119.0% vs SKYW's 43.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.8% | 0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +1900.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.6% | +950.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | +89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +268.6% | +78.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.7% | +119.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MESA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MESA is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYW's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MESA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SKYW's 67.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.94 | $21.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.00 | $0.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.1% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.9 | 98.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 375K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SKYW as "Buy" and MESA as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $122.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | 0.0% |
SKYW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MESA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SKYW vs MESA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYW or MESA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYW or MESA?
On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYW or MESA?
Over the past 5 years, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to +69. 8% for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +268. 6% versus MESA's +78. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYW or MESA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus SkyWest, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning SKYW is approximately 83% more volatile than MESA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SKYW or MESA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWest, Inc. grew EPS 33. 2% year-over-year, compared to -82. 4% for Mesa Air Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYW leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYW or MESA?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -39. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus -46. 5% for MESA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MESA leads at 99. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYW or MESA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYW or MESA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SKYW or MESA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MESA: +78. 7%, SKYW: +268. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYW and MESA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; MESA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.